Will a sufficient number of Americans embrace her Marxist agenda to elect her?
2007-08-20 06:04:56 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. There will be plenty who will but not enough to place her into office. I truly believe that the informed voter won't embrace her agenda.
We'll have a large voter turnout as a result. That turnout will be to vote against her.
2007-08-20 06:12:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
She is doing everything she can to hide her agenda, and the media is helping her along because they know if Americans knew she was a Marxist she is unelectable.
What is funny about this, her negatives in the polls are between 50% and 52%, and there is an internal left bias in polls of about 6%, which means that 56% to 58% of Americans are going to the polls to vote against her. I find that hilarious.
Not only are they going to vote against her, they are going to vote against the other Dems as well, so the Dems might as well get us to a Repub in the WH for the next eight years and at least two years of a Repub majority in both houses of Congress.
Unless they can convince hillary to drop out.
2007-08-20 08:58:18 · answer #2 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I don't think so. In a broad spectrum poll taken about a month ago, 52% said they would not vote for Hillary under any circumstances. That's has to be a disturbing number for the Dems, if she wins the nomination. Then again, her hubby Bubba was elected twice and never received more than 50% of the vote either time.
2007-08-20 06:15:24 · answer #3 · answered by booman17 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's not her Marxist agenda that people hate. It's just her. I really really don't want anyone in the White House that half the Country hates. I't been going on for the past 4 terms and I'm sick of it. I'm also sick of the Clinton's, the Bush family, the Kennedys, et al. It's astounding that we can't seem to do better. Thank these folks for their service and show them the door.
2007-08-20 06:15:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hill and Bill kill anyone in their way. Just look at all the people who've died mysteriously during their governor years and presidential years.
We also do not need a female president right now. We are at war with the middle east -- with fundamental muslims. They despise women and their goal is to kill Americans, christians, and jews. Why would we put a woman in the white house in light of these circumstances?
2007-08-20 06:24:14 · answer #5 · answered by JK 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
In an earlier time in America she might have been unelectable. But as it is now, more than half of Americans derive some kind of benefit from the government, i.e. taxpayers, and that number is only going to increase as the first wave of baby boomers retire from full-time employment. The rule of thumb is that as the number of ppl who receive benefits increases, the more ppl who want benefits also increases.
And the politicians LOVE it.
2007-08-20 06:26:09 · answer #6 · answered by mikey 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She's very electable. Alot of people like her, even some conservatives.
Could you provide proof that she is Marxist. Please show proof in the form of credible websites showing her voting patterns, her political philosophy and her agenda that she has written out for the country. So far, everytime I ask for legitimate proof from you cons on the board, you run the other way with your tail between your legs.
BTW, not that I'm voting for her, because I'm not, but just start getting used to saying "Madam President". Because it is more than likely that she is going to be our next president. The Republicans don't have a candidate who can stand up to her. Not even the dolt Fred Thompson could pull that off.
2007-08-20 06:17:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋
socialism is not marxism.
and she has socialist leanings but is not a socialist.
its nice to see someone with some new thoughts. and the best thing anyone can do if take good ideas from anywhere and everywhere.
2007-08-20 14:57:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
John you must know enough about Hillary to understand her socialist \ marxist views will be very well hidden and completely ignored by the media in the next 16 months. There is no way anything like "socialized medicine" is going to get attached to Hillary now - they won't have it. She'll be "tough" on illegal immigration and then open the border. She'll be opposed to Gay Marriage and then sanction it. The liberal mantra is get elected, say what you must, and then do what ever feels good.
2007-08-20 06:12:52 · answer #9 · answered by netjr 6 · 5⤊ 5⤋
To some people she is God-like. They don't KNOW the true definitions of socialism or Marxism. Many have said that it's simply "time" to put a female in office. Can you dig that? Never mind her position on the issues, it's simply time! With millions of people who think like that, it's VERY possible she could be elected.
And please, don't bring up George Bush. He's about as conservative as she is.
2007-08-20 06:15:03 · answer #10 · answered by Bumblebee711 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋