Does the federal Government endorse Religion over Astrology which is far older then theist religion .
2007-08-20 05:50:15 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They require none on religion, as that would be an a prohibition of the free expression of religion.
Do you espouse any government restrictions on the press?
2007-08-20 14:41:43 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The FCC is a government agency. The government has no authority to regulate religion.
The government could step in if a religious group broadcast legal advice or specific medical treatment claims - but not for claims of faith, although some religious broadcasters have always skated close to the dividing line.
The religious broadcasters are usually very aware of where the line is.
2007-08-20 06:54:10 · answer #2 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
provided that it demands the comparable of ALL networks. Liberals are disappointed because of fact Fox isn't one extra Liberal information Outfit. Fox being the only information outlet that continually comments the two factors of a narrative might needless to say seem biased actual whilst in comparison with the different severe Left information retailers. maximum those that have FDS do no longer even comprehend they have it, nor do they watch Fox information. maximum on the left do no longer even comprehend all the Liberals on Fox information like Susan Estrich, Lanny Davis, Elanor Clift or Allan Colmes to call some. All they see are the human beings on the excellent who're debating them. So sure it may well be solid to have a disclaimer. it might tension the Liberal "information" shows to certainly checklist the information with journalistic ethics and to no longer continually interject their very own evaluations and fact into the rather information.
2016-10-08 21:49:06 · answer #3 · answered by wagstaff 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
On the contrary. On "general purpose" channels (affiliates of Fox, MyTV, CW, Ion, etc) religious shows are treated as "sponsored programming", the same category as an infomercial, and will invariably carry a disclaimer that all claims made therein are the responsibility of the sponsor, in this case, the entity (Schuller, Kennedy, Impe, etc) that produced the program.
2007-08-20 06:04:59 · answer #4 · answered by knoodelhed 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because the FCC doesn't regulate religion.
2007-08-20 05:55:22 · answer #5 · answered by evans_michael_ya 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, the FCC could only do this for broadcasted material...
2007-08-20 05:54:19 · answer #6 · answered by outcrop 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What does the FCC have to do with religion?
2007-08-20 05:57:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What? Not to burst your bubble, but the so-called seperation of church and state cuts both ways.
2007-08-20 05:54:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Good point!
Deliberate deception.
Its all about money.
Like anti-pot ads going in spaces where pro-alcohol ads were.
Its like cigarettes: Regulation and money.
2007-08-20 05:55:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Because religion is based on FAITH.
2007-08-20 05:54:10 · answer #10 · answered by vinny_says_relax 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋