evening standard
2007-08-20 05:48:21 · 25 answers · asked by Muriel L 5 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
This is simply more SPAM by a member of the same group who have posted over 2000 questions about this tragic couple.Have you no consideration for a couple who may have lost a child to a paedophile killer?
I predict these weird people will someday be featured in the medical journal The Lancet, see below
2007-08-20 05:52:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
Just because it could have been a chance burgular does'nt mean that they did'nt take maddie. They could have tried their luck trying to get into apartments and stumbled across the children. Then if they had sexual feelings for children bingo! They could'nt have taken all 3 children and due to the twins ages they would have been harder to look after so they went for the older (and in their opion more attractive) child. I dont believe for a second that the parents or friends had anything to do with it. They clearly love maddie so much (regardless of what others say, they have stayed in portugal this long as they are desparte for their loved child to be found and feel like they are close to her there. my hubby and i have talked about what we would do and it is the same as them, just imagine the agongy of flying home knowing that if she is alive you are leaving her behind living god knows what life. How do they face going into her room at home? It's almost certain they cant return to their proffessions and they have almost no money left (as for the people that say they have cashed in, this is pehtetic. They have paid for the apartment out of their own savings and the only money used from the fund has been used in the search for thier daughter, as it was donated for. They are going through enough turmoil and i hope they never hear the small minded peoples theories on what has happened to their angel.
2007-08-20 17:29:49 · answer #2 · answered by beth t 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but if a burglar (intent on getting easy pickings from an unlocked apartment) made the assumption that if the parents were in the Tapas then the kids must be in the creche, then the PJ might be following this line to rule out DNA.
2007-08-20 13:16:31 · answer #3 · answered by Delly xx 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, simply no evidence and most burglars only want to take and run, not stop and mess with a kid that could cry and wake up the neighbours (like the lady upstairs)
2007-08-20 17:51:53 · answer #4 · answered by rose1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can't imagine why a burglar would take her? But God only knows what some sadistic bastard might do! I think it was one of the Tapas 9!
2007-08-20 15:45:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First, there was nothing else missing from the apartment. Second, why would a burglar kill a child and then dispose of the body?
2007-08-20 13:13:58 · answer #6 · answered by toietmoi 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No I don't. These burglars who prowl around hotel rooms are not normally murderers. They are looking for valuables such as jewellery, watches, money, passports etc. They are not out to kill children. The McCanns and friends know more than they are letting on. The net is closing on these liars.
2007-08-20 13:35:35 · answer #7 · answered by little weed 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hi Muriel L. I don't really think a burglar would have taken her body. Its a really weird case
2007-08-20 14:19:20 · answer #8 · answered by Van der Elst 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
More smear from a bunch of people who have posted 1000s of similar questions. This is hate SPAM and should be removed
2007-08-22 12:41:02 · answer #9 · answered by London Man 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Thank God for the Evening Standard and their miraculous powers of deduction.
2007-08-20 13:29:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If the apartment was unlocked, isn't it possible that the little girl got out by herself and wandered off? Maybe she fell into the sea and was swept away?
2007-08-20 14:13:43 · answer #11 · answered by ♥ Divine ♥ 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋