most of the time they're not actually real meteorologists.
they don't have some specialist sitting there doing science and then reporting on it.
weather people are just pretty faces who are paid to get up for a few minutes each broadcast and read a script. the actual forecast all comes from computers and the services from major meteorological centers.
why dont they save money and just have the anchor read the weather? who needs a separate weather person? it seems a horrible waste of resources.
2007-08-20
05:45:38
·
6 answers
·
asked by
worldpeace
4
in
News & Events
➔ Media & Journalism