If Scientists Can't explain What caused the Big Bang then Why Dont they accept the God Hypothesis?

Question

Scientists assume all sorts of things to explain how Big Bang occured such as Hyper-Space,Multi-Dimensional Space,Multiple Universes,..Etc Which can't even be proved atleast in de near future. Its de same case even with other models. Under science we can assume a theory as valid as long as it satisfactorily explains a natural phenomenon and till someone proves it wrong.. So now whats the problem for the scientific world if they assume that God caused the Big Bang..?? Because there is no reason to Disprove and Oppose it.. But some may argue "How did God come in the first place..?"Well.. Since Space-time began at Big Bang we can argue that since God created Space-Time..He is beyond time.. So u cant point to the time when God was formed.. Because if u try to do so u will be confining God within Time limits.. But he existed before time began for he himself was the creator of time at Big Bang..!!So since he is beyond time we can argue that he was never created but He always existed..!

Answer 1

Scientists, who study the natural world, dont like to consider god in the equation, because he is outside the natural world, having supernatural powers and all. Saying "god created everything", even in the context you are putting it, is like cheating. Whether god exists or not, the universe has been caused by a natural process, so scientists leave their faiths apart.
Besides, if the brane theory is correct, and the universe was caused with a collition of two higher planes, how were those planes moving, when space-time didnt exist? (because we only know space time to be localized) and how did they come to existance anyway? Every scientific discovery is just a step forward of"understanding God".

Answer 2

Are you seriously asking this in the science and maths category??

You seem to have answered your own question

".Etc Which can't even be proved atleast in de near future. Its de same case even with other models"

wouldn't you say same applies to god??(please don't give stupid answers like "because of faith there is god" or because of miracles there is god" )

"Under science we can assume a theory as valid as long as it satisfactorily explains a natural phenomenon and till someone proves it wrong"

Wouldn't you say the various theories have more worth since they give explanation for at least some things about the universe. the god argument is just "I am therefore I am."

"So now whats the problem for the scientific world if they assume that God caused the Big Bang..?? Because there is no reason to Disprove and Oppose it.."

If other theories didn't exist which made more sense ( maybe not complete sense) god theory would be fine . But they do exist and are more logical then the god theory.

Listen buddy , I believe in god as much as you do. I pray every week and seek his guidance whenever I need to.

But if you are actually going to start a Logic, based on facts arguments about science and god, you'll lose in a milisecond. it's part of a scientists training to look at facts and find the most simple and logical explanation. Don't try to fight them on their own turf. Believe in god but let him/her/it remain a mystery that you try to solve through faith and they try to solve through empirical data.

Answer 3

The difficulties of the 'God Hypothesis' are more numerous than you seemto think.

First of all, when we say that a person created, say, a machine, we mean that the person used the laws of physics and the materials around him/her to form that machine. The process can be investigated in detail and the laws of physics apply at every stage.

In contrast, when you say that 'God created the universe', no mechanism is given, no laws of physcs are assumed, and no way is allowed to investiagte the process, even on a theoretical level. In other words, the 'explanation' doesn't really explain anything! Furthermore, the hypothesis doesn't allow any further predictions that can be tested, even on a theoretical level. So, while M-theory has not as yet been tested, it does allow testing at the theoretical level by making predictions about how things work at the level of what we can detect.

The upshot is that the 'God Hypothesis' does not help in any way to understand how the universe came into being and requires a host of other assumptions without giving any new testable insights.

Answer 4

Assuming "god" created the big bang is NOT scientific reasoning. The big bang IS the beginning of time, saying what happened before makes no sense so therefore there couldn't possibly be any being "creating" the big bang. The big bang just happened, thats the beginning. Saying "god did it!" sure simplifies things, but is not the right answer. We can say "god did it!" to every question science has not answered yet, but then you kill the very purpose of science.
You're also saying that "god is beyond time" or whatever, but you can't just be assuming stuff like that. You have no proof, and some of your statements will NEVER have any proof, in other words saying "god did it!" or "god exists beyond time" or just simply "god exists" will never be proven right nor wrong, therefore they are not scientific and not even theories. I can say Sonic the Hedgehog created the universe and you'll never prove me wrong, but does that make me right?

Answer 5

Well, you have it sort of right that it has just as much validity as any other theory. However, most other things can be explained, TESTED, and proven with scientific theory, so it follows that eventually the Big Bang might be able to too. Testing and proving God negates his existence in the first place, so at this point its just people saying "It's God", with no reasoning behind it.

But, there are many religious scientists out there who suggest that God created the Universe and everything in it with clear, defined reasons, and therefore God and science can co-exist harmoniously.

Answer 6

Firstly, who says they don't? I know a number of scientists who are deeply religious people. The thing about science is that you can never totally exclude a god or gods from the system because something can always be explained as 'god did it that way'.

Secondly, God is by definition not part of science, since you cannot objectively prove or disprove the existence of a god. For that reason no true scientific theory will ever include the non-scientific explanation or hypothesis that god did it.

Answer 7

Whenever man didn't understand something he reasoned, "it must be god!" The angels must be moving the planets around on crystal spheres, right? But science has shown that this kind of thinking is foolish. This has happened many many times throughout history. So we have found something that man doesn't fully understand - yet again. So do we say this time, yet again, "oh it must be God!" History has shown, many many times that this kind of thinking is foolishness. Just because we don't understand something doesn't equate to a religious experience. We just have to wait for time and science to find an answer.
For example perhaps our big bang is one of many such rare and random events that happens throught space. Perhaps these other big bangs are too far away from us to be observed.

Answer 8

howdy Bruce, in my opinion, i think that the "huge Bang" is actual. The state of affairs is a sprint different nevertheless. To my recommendations, the Universe became created only the way the scientists have confidence. the difference is that God mentioned "enable this is", and BANG! The Universe became created. Have a great day.

Answer 9

Its often said that "those who have faith need no explanation those who do not no explanation will do"...It will always be open to speculation as to where we came from and always be open as to where we are going .Its good to know both sides of the argument as both will give directions . Tempering your scientific life with a moment of religious guidance is the only thing that separates the evil from the good in this world. When Teller created the first atomic bomb he was without question the top scientist of his day and in his autobiography he writes how he wishes the use was to SAVE lives not take them as Murder was against his upbringing(this upbringing he spoke about was the church)....Good luck from the E........

Answer 10

The Big Bang theory is a creation theory that tries to determine what kind of process was used to Create the Universe.
The fact that its a creation theory implies a Creator.Therefore the Theory in no way leaves God out as the The Creator of the Universe.