LOL...that's funny!
2007-08-20 03:52:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Page 4
·
6⤊
3⤋
Yes. They claim that Clinton had Potter put the hit on Voldemorte to prevent him testifying at the impeachment hearings. Ken Starr says that the recordings from "He whom we do not name's" crystal ball would have clinched convictions on several counts of the indictment.
We'd like to give it a rest, Kathy. But, if it weren't for beating dead horses, Busheviks wouldn't get any exercise at all. So the same old false accusations keep coming up and need putting down over and over.
2007-08-20 03:57:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Dude, Lord Voldemort is not defeated. He comes back in the next two books to menace Harry. And can we please stop dragging up Bill Clinton? He hasn't been President now for 7 years.... Give it a rest....
2007-08-20 03:57:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Kiddie politics. Lovely.
2007-08-20 03:58:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
LOL. giggle.
Clinton is reponsible for it all even before his birth, and after he dies. His weak policies surely helped Potter.
Unless its a good thing then Bush and his henchmen did that.
2007-08-20 04:09:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nurse Winchester 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
LOL! I don't blame for Clinton for everything. Having said that,do not mistake that for any admiration I have for him.
2007-08-20 03:56:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nikki 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Event do I cant reed it was steel beelys fault. so jus think right yall and you ok. ok?
Heck I can eben spell "w"
2007-08-20 05:33:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
you'd have this country divided even in your harry potter-dungeons and dragons-living in mom's basement world wouldn't you? instead of looking for new ways to divide this great nation, why not make it stronger through unity?
2007-08-20 03:55:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
I bet you dress up as a wizard,dork.
2007-08-20 03:55:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Gordon..... come on man. We and they don't blame Clinton for everything.
It's still funny though! lol!
2007-08-20 03:54:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Good one!
However, you know, they just aren't the literary type
2007-08-20 05:31:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by Jackie Oh! 7
·
1⤊
0⤋