Nothing will be You if You cannot be thought as "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, link, limit, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, and fulfillment."
I want to rephrase this statement in the context of http://wwf.totalh.com/tp/predictor.php
I want ot replace the term "nothing" with a suitable term.
I need your help in fixing this.
2007-08-20
00:59:26
·
9 answers
·
asked by
The Knowledge Server
1
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
As far as i can understand, "Nothing will be you" means that nothing will have the element of "you", or your uniqueness, unless of course you fulfil those stated requirements. Perhaps you could replace "nothing" with "no element". Generally, i can't find a term broad enough to think of all elements, "everything".
2007-08-20 01:14:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mercenary Poet 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
You are not if you do not think your self and thought is the qualities of part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, link, limit, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, fulfillment, ..... in a word 'purpose'.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erick_Erickson
The Will is positive, the Judgment is negative.
2007-08-20 22:16:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Psyengine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing is a suitable term. But instead of "Nothing will be you.
"You are considered" or "You are nothing if not part of a whole, equivalence, ect.
"Nothing" can be viewed as the trails you have not yet faced in becoming a member of a society or part of a group.
2007-08-20 15:46:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Damian S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes;
Prediction is only a forecast.The bad side of Darwin-ism
forecast"woes"and"ills"for mankind;this side also uses
so-called impressive and high-faluting language(!).
So you may not be aware of this but the other(possibly)
younger readers should be.
All if not most can be explained by the work(s) of the late
critical scholar called Sir karl Popper.
2007-08-20 09:19:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by peter m 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
this is one of those grammar/lexicon questions for me. you're using 'nothing' as a diectic(a pointing word) and as there's nothing to point to it's confusing because there is still a WORD that points suggesting there IS something there!
DEFINE the 'concept' you're referring to with 'nothing' and the problem will simply vanish - you just need to 'unpack' the words you're using...and that's gonna take more than a single phrase!
2007-08-20 08:53:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by mlsgeorge 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If thou shall become a shell of emptiness, void of all essential elements of any being, thou can be considered lifeless and hypothetical and therefore nonexistent
...sorry i think i misinterpreted your statement.
it should be:
Thou shall not be comprehended if thou is hypothetical and cannot be individualized nor defined
2007-08-20 08:27:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by caroline 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
...that the "fruit of your spirit" should be Love, Joy, Peace, Patience, Meekness, Kindness, Goodness, Faithfullness and Self control...
2007-08-20 08:10:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. tried. Brain went numb.
2007-08-20 08:47:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by MI5 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
it should b "nothing can b someone...."
2007-08-20 08:27:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋