No, they should have a child and name it "Dooby" and move to Weed, California~
2007-08-19 20:53:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Call me-C-4-Curious- 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
As I am not a lawyer, I'll say - hydroponically speaking, start the process from the grass root level. Get a top-of-the-crop lawyer to check that the papers are of good standard so it doesn't create too much hassle as the court might think this is a smoke screen. Weed out unnecessary rubbish. It will take time for all parties to get high enough into the listing for you to get a hearing so, be patient. If you play by the rules, you will harvest a good result.
2016-04-01 08:21:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well lets see here chances are if both parents smoke marijuana the kid will too so yeah i guess joint custody of the kids would be good. As for joint custody of a joint hopefully you have two joints and you can each have one
2007-08-19 20:55:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Starbright 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
They better get straight before they even act toward divorce, any less fight over who gets what of the joint.
2007-08-19 21:00:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well it is a five star joke but I can only give you one.
2007-08-19 22:22:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Patti C 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well if they have any brain cells left, maybe they will forget they were even married....
2007-08-19 21:09:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by tigers2424 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
You might need to reefer that to a lawyer, I suggest Mary Jane, they tell me she's "smokin'......
2007-08-19 20:52:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
To be blunt, they should spliff..I mean split them evenly.
2007-08-19 20:53:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Lefty 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Lawfully speaking there should be a "GAGGER" order.
2007-08-19 21:10:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by mjfrog 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The judge would be stoned if he didn't grant it...
2007-08-20 02:45:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by itty 7
·
1⤊
0⤋