English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-19 20:01:38 · 6 answers · asked by white_ghetto_supastar 3 in Education & Reference Higher Education (University +)

6 answers

THey are both really good schools. I like USC better than UCLA, but you would be really lucky to go to either.

2007-08-19 20:05:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

For which subject matter? They are actually very similar in rank; in the new U.S. News survey, UCLA ranked #25 nationally and USC #27, so there clearly is not a huge difference in overall quality. The big difference, of course, is in cost. UCLA is a public school; for a California resident the cost is $6522/year. USC is private, and the cost is $35,810/year.

2007-08-20 03:11:26 · answer #2 · answered by neniaf 7 · 0 0

UCLA has a better law school, USC has a better football team

2007-08-20 03:09:05 · answer #3 · answered by aloha1 2 · 0 0

UCLA is better academic and ranking wise. USC is more of a party school.

2007-08-20 03:08:41 · answer #4 · answered by <3 4 · 0 0

UCLA is better academically or atleast it has the rep. but youd be lucky to go to any of the two, you really cant go wrong with any of the two

2007-08-20 03:10:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Who knows, man. I wouldn't want to go to either. Partly because I'd be surrounded by the type of people who believe them to be the only 2 colleges in the world.

2007-08-20 04:21:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers