All of creation?

Question

Now I want you to write all you budding scientists the following equation to this question about creation..
and the question is
WHY...

ideas are not answer they are only ideas

this has nothin to do with love I want an eqation for why.

why is not a speculation why is a question and all questions can be answered.

LOL..to ip address 62,040,610 idiots..
very good..nice observation about grammar.

pretty good jaz ur thinkin deep and mabe closer than u think

Answer 1

This is obviously only going to purely speculation, and this is not per say an equation, but here is a possible answer.

The Universe has undergone, perhaps multiple times, destruction and recreation of itself. Meaning all the matter, energy, and all of it's counterparts have been destroyed and recreated through a series of clashes with other universes*.

These collisions explain the "creation" of new universes in that the matter and energy are in essence "reset" and to continue on the course of natural evolutionary star and planet building as we understand it.

To explain the creation of life however may have been a more exotic emergence. Through these collisions each universe could have possibly shared information through matter and energy exchange in the collision. If life had existed in one universe, the information may have been passed through the collision. Therefore, the strings, through this pass of information, instinctively knew to aggregate when conditions were right for the forming of life.

Another explanation is that if Superstring theory is correct, strings disappear and reappear into and from another dimension and possibly multiple dimensions ( I will not elaborate on this due to time constraints, but this concept is not as exotic as most people think). If this is occurring, it could be another way information is being passed from one string to the other. And if this is the case, than perhaps all of the universes contain some lifeform or another.

Of course, everything from the big bang, intelligent creation, or superstring theory, are exactly that, theories. Until one can be proved without a shadow of doubt. Personally, I'm rooting for Superstring....lol.

~jaz~

Answer 2

40+2

Answer 3

"WHY" is not a question. It is a 3 letter word that can be used as an interrogative.
To make it a question, it needs to be punctuated, like this:
"Why?"

As for an equation, how about:
(23 + 8 + 25) * 0.75 = 42

Thus:
Q: Why?
A: (23 + 8 + 25) * 0.75 = 42

Answer 4

The assumption behind asking why is that there is a reason or purpose to the universe, life or whatever. There is no reason or purpose imposed on you by any thing out side yourself. What ever reason or purpose or answer you find to the question of why, can come only from something you find inside yourself.

Answer 5

WHY? So that new learning experience / observations can be had. The equation in mathmatical terms is not possible, perhaps in 'theory' but true figures can not be made. WHY? Because these new learning experiences and observations are 'NEW', new has too many varibles.

Answer 6

Why not?

Science does not try to answer the question why, instead we try to answer the question how. And that we are still working on, but we have some good ideas.

Answer 7

Humans Have an inlination to be creative .We just like to create.Why? Because we find life is a great Gift and we enjoy it.

Answer 8

Love.

Answer 9

Science does not deal with "why" -- only "how". Any opinion as to the ultimate "why" of anything is pure speculation.

Answer 10

Sorry, you don't get an equation for "why."

Science isn't about either equations or why's. Go talk to a philosopher.