I'll tell you why.
- You have to buy a separate HD-DVD Player, for movies.
- You have to buy a separate Wi-Fi adapter
- It's Technically Less powerful than the PS3 (CPU, GPU, RAM)
and the biggest problem: Games are limited to DVD's (8.5GB). PS3 has integrated Blu-Ray, with capacity up to 50GB.
Wakeup, 360 fanboys! Within a year, Games will break that barrier - you can't fit EVERYHTING onto an outdated 8.5GB DVD!!!
You noobs criticize it because of its lack of titles right now. We'll see who wins in the end. Give it time, you'll be regretting your purchase.
By 2010, Gears of War will be considered retardedly primitive.
Hell, by 2008 even! Metal Gear Solid 4 is exclusive to the PS3 for this reason Also, IT JUST WONT FIT.
Better framerates and MORE SPACE for textures, maps, models, and GAMES in general.
Think about the future, people.
In the long run, the PS3 will blow the 360 away.
The revolution starts October 31st. (Call of Duty 4)
2007-08-19
17:12:40
·
8 answers
·
asked by
gplpark92
2
in
Games & Recreation
➔ Video & Online Games
- No 1080P full HD
and I don't see people installing OS's and surfing the web on their 360s...
2007-08-19
17:16:57 ·
update #1
BTW IM NOT DISSING 360 GAMES
there are some GREAt 360 games out and coming out... im just tryin to make a point about it being technologically weaker and limited!!
2007-08-19
17:56:25 ·
update #2
That is exactly how I feel about the 360. To me, it is just a console that is stuck in the previous generation of consoles. The games aren't any different except for better graphics. Future PS3 games are going to make 360 games look like childs play. Sony makes way better games than Microsoft does. I mean, most of the 360's big game titles are shooters. Halo, Gears of War, and Bioshock is all I hear about. What else does the 360 have to offer? Nothing!
Sony has other big titles coming like- Uncharted: Drakes Fortune, Lair, Final Fantasy XIII, Killzone 2, Tekken 6, Gran Turismo HD, Metal Gear Solid 4, and more.
Xbox 360 fanboys should already know that thier console is already becoming obsolete, they just don't wan't to admit it. All they have to hold on to to keep them warm is Halo 3.
Playstation 3 is the best.
2007-08-19 17:33:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by AdrianClay 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
The PS3 and the 360 are both awesome. The PS3 is more user friendly as far as home entertainment. The 360 has a better online marketplace... The Wii has a Weather Channel, which is cooler than anything. Free Online Gaming is a plus the PS3 and Wii have that the 360 does not. Honestly, none of them reign supreme. Fanboys limit themselves while true gamers take the whole pie. If you really want to game, buy all three, or just shut your broke mouth.
2007-08-19 17:51:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Not a question but it just shows fanboism, you call 360 owners noobs - why are there 11+ million of them in the world, so here its you sounding like the noobish fanboy, Just grow Up.
And half of it is not true, Better Games are coming to 360 and not PS3, like Halo, BioShock, Mass Effect, Downloadable extra content on GTA 4, Call of Duty 4 is on 360 too. Two Worlds,
As well as already out games like Gears of War, Oblivion, Saints Row, Dead Rising, Viva Pinata, Lost Planet , Rockstar Table Tennis, the list goes on and on.
And *Gasp* Devil May Cry, one of Sony's most devoted franchises is coming to 360 now, This will soon happen to all games and more and more 360 exclusives will come, Same situation with RE5.
So think before you speak and grow up
And to point out the 360 now has 1080p from Xbox Live, What do you say to that?
2007-08-19 17:24:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by moberater 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
...... this website is for asking questions and receiving answers. not to post an answer to your own question about how your nerd machine is superior to a more entertaining nerd machine....
but... to answer your... answer, the 360 isn't inferior to the 360. as for call of duty 4, i believe that the 360 is getting a beta version of that. and for buying a separate HD dvd player is so they can charge you less for the system, instead of charging more for it if they were to include an HD dvd player. i believe that the 360 is made for gaming, not watching movies. i believe that gears has always been boring, for me anyways. but i personally don't find metal gear solid any better. and just because the PS3 was released later, it doesn't meen "future"
i just read your additional details, and the reason you don't see that (yet) is because people who buy a 360 still have enough money left for a computer....>__>
2007-08-19 17:21:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Eric 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
360: $100 - Wifi Adapter $50 a year - Online Gaming $30 - Charge controller $20 - Intercooling fan $100 - HD DVD PS3: Free - Built in Wifi Free - Online Gaming Free - USB to charge controller Free - Built in Fan Free - Blu-Ray Player Look up Uncharted 2, that should be your first game. You don't need to play the first one to get it.
2016-05-17 21:11:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dont have either but i think ps3 sucks. its gigantic size isn't very convenient. the only good games that it has is also on xbox 360. it costs 700 bucks. because of the blu-ray, each game is 60-70 dollars. because of its powerful cell processor, game companies find it hard to make games for it, that is why it lost so many good games
2007-08-19 17:25:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The only problem is the $700 cost.
2007-08-19 17:20:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bon Jovi Rocks Hard 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
it's actually not inferior....
2007-08-19 17:20:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by amyhwoods 5
·
2⤊
1⤋