2007-08-19 14:51:00 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=6975
2007-08-19 14:51:15 · update #1
who does Ethan, not me..can't you answer my question?
2007-08-19 14:57:16 · update #2
Clinton is/was a neoconservative as far as I am concerned.
2007-08-19 14:58:07 · update #3
Flaws, my god, read my link!
2007-08-19 14:58:42 · update #4
What..... CLEARLY YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT A NEOCONSERVATIVE IS.
2007-08-19 15:04:25 · update #5
Lady Shondra
i COULD PROVIDE YOU WITH HUNDREDS OF LINKS ALONG THESE LINES...JUST TYPE "Reagan allows sells of chemicals to Iraq and watch what happens."
2007-08-19 15:06:19 · update #6
Dee B you are reported, I did not insult anyone, but yet you chose the low road.
2007-08-19 15:07:44 · update #7
KARL K start with the section on the link I provided.
2. U.S. COVERING UP COMPLICITY IN SADDAM CHEMICAL WARFARE?
2007-08-19 15:21:24 · update #8
censoredbyevil
Reagan fought for corporate interests and nothing else, how dare you! tell me to respect the man who is responsible for countlessmurders in Central and South America, arming Saddam with the presursor ingredients that he used to kill with, firing all the ATC"s, a blow to working to all working class people. It is you who needs to re-read your history.
2007-08-19 15:49:15 · update #9
http://www.iranchamber.com/podium/miscellaneous/041010_past_failures_present_opportunities.pdf
2007-08-19 15:52:28 · update #10
Those of you who are Reagan supporters, as I figured know nothing about how evil he was, and even worse than that, you don't care to know, much like many of you do with Bush.
So why do you even come to the politics area when you are so ill equiped to respond intelligently?
2007-08-19 15:55:49 · update #11
I do not respect reagan... he for some reason is the neo-cons hero... and really he has set our country up for the hell its in now... He kept people locked up in iran so he could win the election... not an idea of a hero!
2007-08-19 16:12:40 · answer #1 · answered by Gabe_the_Man82 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Maybe if you grow up you will see how foolish the link you provided really is and how you are being manipulated into following those who would destroy your freedom to question any leaders.
Reagan wasn't perfect, no one is, but people like you could learn and benefit a lot by following the path set by those like Reagan who fought for your right to succeed in America if you would only stop believing the lying liberals who tell you America sucks. It is you and your kind, not Reagan, for whom I have no respect.
The fact that you are listed as a "top contributor" shows how wrong yahoo is when they say "top contributors" have knowledge worth spreading.
2007-08-19 22:38:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Booman, nobody has to know squat about anything to waste time on Y!A, superpolitics demonstrates that. All you need is a computer and a lot of time on your hands. Superpolitics either has no life and is holed up in mamas basement or hes a paid hack of the democratic party. Reagan was by far the best president in my lifetime.
2007-08-19 22:45:17 · answer #3 · answered by T D 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Reagan supported the Iraqis because they opposed the Iranians. He caused deaths in Central America to stop the communists. The enemy of your enemy is your friend, and if you think it isn't, then feel free to move to Iran or Cuba and see what they're like.
2007-08-20 00:16:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
"This Bang-Your-Head-Against-a-Wall moment was brought to you by..."
There isn't enough difference between politicians or the two major parties anymore for either side to win this argument. Most votes are cast for the lesser of two evils and we switch the party in power every few years to keep things interesting.
The best we can do is try to put good people in office and hope that they make good decisions for as long as possible.
2007-08-19 23:37:47 · answer #5 · answered by maisie 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i couldnt find his name mentioned anywhere on that link. i will look again.
after a lot of dry and misleading reading, i did find his name mentioned as being president when shultz was sec. of state. but i already knew that.
i suppose he had his flaws (although none were mentioned on your link) but the guy freed more people than moses, let him rest in peace for crying out loud.
we are all familiar with the liberal line, there were no WMDs and we gave them to him. it is not a very compelling argument.
2007-08-19 22:04:49 · answer #6 · answered by karl k 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Reagan is universally recognized as one of the best President;s of the 20th century. How did you become a top contributor? I thought you actually had to know something about the subject.
2007-08-19 22:04:52 · answer #7 · answered by booman17 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
all presidents have their flaws and detractors. history, in retropect, is the judge of a president's effectiveness as it takes awhile for their policies to be prove as helpful or hurtful. history has judged Regan as helpful. and you need to have a wider view of history than one person's opinion.
2007-08-19 22:02:52 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
If you think Clinton was a neoconservative then you must be going crazy right now............
2007-08-19 22:01:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
What you are linking to isn't the truth. I met the man twice; he had more honesty, integrity, and character in his little finger than you have in your whole miserable little liberal body.
It still amazes me that libs can post total garbage on the internet and their brain-dead lemmings will believe it.
2007-08-19 22:03:35 · answer #10 · answered by Dee B 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋