who is whackier? Ron Paul or Mike Gravel?

Answer 1

you for not studying the issues and keeping your head in the sand about the problems that this country is facing. change is needed and there is only one person that has proven to fight against big government and that is Ron Paul

"War, and the threat of war, are big government's best friend," he wrote only recently. "Liberals support big government social programs, and conservatives support big government war policies, thus satisfying two major special interest groups. And when push comes to shove, the two groups cooperate and support big government across the board — always at the expense of personal liberty. Both sides pay lip service to freedom, but neither stands against the welfare-warfare state and its promises of unlimited entitlements and endless war."

No voice for peace has been as consistent in the demand that government stop its intervention across the board. No supporter of free markets has been so determined to apply the logic of liberty to all aspects of foreign policy.

vote out the incumbents and vote 3rd party , its time for a change

vote Ron Paul 08'

the only wasted vote is for the status quo

Answer 2

Neither of them is really "whacky"

Mike Gravel means what he says, and says what he means. He just has no real clout anymore and uses the debates as a way of pointing out the BS that is being spewed rather than talking about the issues he finds important. Though honestly that gays in the military quote where he talked about Sparta and such was a bit out there.

Ron Paul on the other hand is a legitimate canidate, and while Gallup is only giving him 3 points (29 behind Gulli) he still stands a good chance of shaping the root this campaign takes if not winning it. What makes him seem whacky is that he isn't saying what we'd expect him to, but that isn't being whacky...it is being a traditional Republican

Answer 3

It's convenient to dismiss a person's views with a simple label. How about you change direction with your questions. While more challenging, this will get to the heart of the issues and might actually have a chance to change some minds.

Try a question like:

"Gravel/Paul supporters, will you please support your candidate's stance on..."

You could then state your reasons for why you think the stance is wrong or wacky in the details and allow supporters to respond. Just making a blanket statement that a candidate is wacky isn't going to get you anywhere.

Answer 4

i replaced into offended whilst the la cases what offered up via the tribune. the way information replaced into pronounced exchange and had an excellent extra liberal twist. the information source is coming from even below it ever did with each and all of the mega mergers. the prosperous is attempting to distort the information for their very own objective, it particularly is why maximum of billionaires are biding for the tribune whilst it went up on the marketplace, in spite of it dropping money. i replaced into offended to work out the press placed forth a handful of applicants. by using out the race on the democrat area, they only talk approximately Obama and Hillary. In la, they inform you you're able to pass out to vote, and that's not significant if that's Obama or Hillary. they decline to even point out Republican applicants besides as different Democrats. I even have notice a sluggish decline in our press with the aid of fact the 80's and freedom with it. Democrats have been complaining approximately Bush, yet the two events are to blame. Clinton began to centralize means with the line merchandise vetos. I attempt listening to the BBC for another perspective

Answer 5

Are the responses not going as hoped?

http://thespinfactor.com/thetruth/2007/08/20/ron-paul-earns-the-worlds-attention/

Answer 6

I'm gonna say neither one.

Gravel is a legitimate liberal with solid credentials from years ago. Paul is a legitimate conservative with solid credentials from the Reagan years and also more recently.

I think the wacky ones are Giuliani who comes off as a buffoon and can't even get along with his own family. Or Edwards, who thinks it's normal to pay $400 for a haircut and then moans about how he understands being poor. It would really be funny if it weren't so sad.

But hey, you go ahead and treat them like they're normal, and laugh at whoever the press tells you is ok to laugh at. How's that workin' for ya?

Answer 7

I remember Mike Gravel from back in the early 70s, and then he completely disappeared until recently. Where's he been all these decades??

Answer 8

Mitt Romney tied his dog to the top of his car on a family trip to Ontario.

Rudy Guiliani thinks he saved New York on 9/11.

Hillary is STILL married to Bill.

Barack Obama has admitted to using cocaine.

As previously mentioned, John Edwards pays $400 for a haircut.

John McCain looks like he is about to blast off into outer space when he speaks, and most of his movements look robotic. I am not his friend.

Mike Huckabee is, well, Mike Huckabee.

I think you HAVE to be a little crazy in order to run for President, why else would anyone spend $550 Million for a job that pays far less?

Answer 9

Wow it's a sad day when good presidential candidates that are running on an anti-war ticket are considered wacky while corrupt war mongers like Giuliani, Clinton, Obama and the rest of the CFR crime sydicate are the normal ones.

Answer 10

Ron Paul 2008 yessssssssssssssss. i told at least 10 friends of him and his views. everyone is for him