English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm writing this question to inquire if a law against psychological coercion would be helpful in stemming cases of domestic abuse, and other forms of sophisticated manipulation that exist in our society?

If you agree, what type of issues or language would you suggest be included in such a provision under a state or local statute?

2007-08-19 13:25:44 · 2 answers · asked by creativus_maximus 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

2 answers

We don't need a separate additional law.

Emotional abuse is already covered under most domestic violence (and similar abuse) statutes, as well as criminal threatening and harassment. And it's already grounds for recission (canceling) an contract signed under duress.

So, there's really nothing to be gained for making it its own law, unless you wanted a lesser punishment that it's most common applications above.

2007-08-22 23:46:47 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 0

While the passing of federal legislation would cause masters level therapists, psychologists and psychiatrists to "think twice" before using pseudo-scientific techniques such as play therapies, CBT, EMDR, psychoeducation, dream therapy, art therapy, sodium amytal, et al, due to the possibility that same may lose their license, and/or be criminally/civilly sanctioned, this is such a huge industry, I don't see it happening in my lifetime.

Dean Tong
www.abuse-excuse.com

2007-08-19 20:51:00 · answer #2 · answered by Dean T 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers