"I remember getting a call from the...er...fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."
http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...
surely you guys didn't think a team of demolition experts could go in that same day, while the building is on fire, and plant explosives.
here is a clip of john kerry admitting they pulled building 7
if you notice, in the beginning he lies by saying ," well, thats a new one to me." then later just a few minutes later he states, "I do know that, that wall was in danger, and they made a decision based on the danger. that it had of destroying other things that they did it in a controlled fashion."
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8224434430409575306&q=john+kerry+wtc+7&total=36&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=8
Bushies, can you explain?
2007-08-19 12:31:50 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
by the way, larry silverstein bought the entire wtc complex 6 weeks (july 2001) prior to 9/11. he paid 200 million dollars on a 99 year lease. took out insurance policy that was worth 3.5 billion. then he ended up getting 7 billion, saying it was two seperate terror attacks.
2007-08-19 12:34:02 · update #1
how can kerry go from "thats a new one to me..." to knowing the wall was in danger and they made the decision to do it in a controlled fashion? how did he just go from being ignorant on the subject to knowing exactly what happened and what decisions were made. either way, he is a liar.
2007-08-19 12:44:36 · update #2
It means the building was pulled with explosives and they planted them well in advance.
2007-08-19 12:41:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If people don't ask questions, there are never any answers. I have been in the "asking questions" business all of my life, and I have developed a healthy respect for those who question and investigate events.
If I were President and a person walked up to me and said, "Our country has been attacked, and the WTC is collapsing," I would have jumped up in total alarm, aghast at this possibility, and raced from the room to see what I could do. Someone else would have had to explain things to the children.
George Bush sat....for seven minutes...without a single expression of surprise. There was no alarm. There was no shock and horror. There was no emotion.
People accused of murder have been vilified for their "lack of affect." Prosecutors constantly use this as proof of guilt.
It doesn't necessarily mean a person is guilty of anything, but it may well display prior knowledge.
I don't think the government put bombs in those buildings, but I know nothing for sure. Our government has done some terrible things in its time. But I do believe they knew those attacks were coming. They had had many warnings of them. These warnings were ignored. How any government could get 11 warnings of imminent attack and not have those attack planes ready, just in case, is beyond comprehension.
One emotion George Bush was definitely not displaying in that schoolroom was surprise.
2007-08-20 02:56:13 · answer #2 · answered by Me, Too 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can't tell if trolling or just stupid. He meant pull the firefighters out and just let it collapse. It's really amazing how stupid some "truthers" are. Honestly, how nuts do you have to be to watch two giant airliners packed with jet fuel slam into buildings igniting a massive inferno that burned for two hours and then say "well this interview with some guy could kind of be taken like there might have been explosives somewhere"?
2016-05-17 10:50:38 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lovee is all wet . . . he who ignores the past is doomed to repeat it . . . which terrorists? The ones who got blamed or the ones who did it?
2007-08-19 14:16:54 · answer #4 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you know what? instead of dreading on the past....maybe we should be preparing for the future because um terrorists are still around
2007-08-19 13:24:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree with Lovee.
2007-08-19 13:48:29 · answer #6 · answered by mark623112 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I CHECKED OUT YOUR WEBSITE AND YOU DO NOT HAVE ANY PROOF OF WHAT YOU SAY.... ER.....
WHY DO YOU LIE..?? I GUESS WE COULD CALL IT WHY DO YOU INVENT??/
I AM NOT A KERRY FAN AT ALL.
YOU ARE IN ERR....SORRY.....
2007-08-19 13:17:42 · answer #7 · answered by mary 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋