That's all Vick did was help get rid of dangerous animals that attck humans everyday. We all have seen the show when animals attack. How many times are rotwiellers and pitbulls on that show attacking humans. Vick was simply trying to make the world a safer place for kids and adults. Plus make a little money on the side. I don't see what is wrong with that. We sit back and watch when two humans are put in a cage (UFC) and knock each other out, why not watch animals do it? We are higher on the food chain for a reason. VICK FOR PRESIDENT 2016!
2007-08-19 10:04:17 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Exactly. They are using him as a scapegoat in all of this. He did nothing wrong. They haven't proved anything. He'll be back stronger than ever.
2007-08-20 05:08:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
These dogs don't attack because of the kind of dog they are, it's because of they type of human that owns them. They have been trained to behave this way (any dog can be made into a killer) and it was nothing but wrong of him to engage in dog fighting on any level. Their punishment for losing is death and their reward is eventual death. They aren't taken home after a fight and given love and affection, they aren't the family pet when the match is over. They are put in a cage so they can't eat the throat out of their owners. When people go into a cage or a ring and beat the hell out of each other, it's their choice. The dogs are not given a choice.
2007-08-19 10:24:39 · answer #2 · answered by ♪♪BandMom♪♪ 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Maybe Vick should deal with you! I believe "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth".Vick will get his as will you. I agree, dogs attack because they are provoked, what about the millions of dogs that never even nip at someone? It's probably because they were never provoked. As far as putting them in the ring or cage, a human can say no!! and as for president, you clearly let us know your I.Q.
2007-08-19 10:21:39 · answer #3 · answered by Allan C 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I fill that vick should be treated the same way he did the dogs. besides who did and left him in charge to decide who lives or dies. if that is the case then we should be the ones to decides if he is guilty or innocent. And you are no better then he is if you fill that what he did was right, becouse you can not comper humans and animals as ONE.
8/19/07 Thank You
T.H
2007-08-19 11:06:44 · answer #4 · answered by TINA H 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reason we don't do that with ufc fighters is they are not animals. They have a soul, dogs do not. Yes animal cruelty is wrong but who cares if a couple Pitts die. They are naturally aggressive and are the most territorial. They will attack if there is a female in heat and you are a stranger. So if you wanna compare dogs to us then i will gladly **** on your floor, chew your nice shoes and go for your throat when my mate is pregnant and you come near. Honestly there are so many things like this going on. Let Vick play and make him take animal awareness classes and pay a huge fine.
2007-08-19 10:17:52 · answer #5 · answered by wombizzle 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I don't watch UFC either. But those guys are participating voluntarily, they are Paid, and no one ends up dead at the end of a match.
Animals that are domesticated by humans rely on US for every thing they need to survive. Putting them through torture sessions resulting in death is a shameful misuse of a life we are entrusted to protect.
It would be permissible to "put down" a viscious animal. It is another thing to cause it to be viscious and to profit from its gruesome self-destruction.
Surely you can see that.
2007-08-19 10:17:34 · answer #6 · answered by chocolahoma 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you agree with his actions and believe that animal abuse is okay then perhaps you should suffer the same fate as the animal Vick killed, but live through it to let us know if you still think it was right.
2007-08-19 10:08:49 · answer #7 · answered by compendious 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
damn, you're absolutely right. what were we all thinking? he wasn't creating and harboring dangerous animals, he was helping get rid of them. this arguement would be a great skit for the Phil Henry radio show. seriously, if Vick is guilty of all this stuff it's obviously pretty despicable that's for the courts to decide. i say he should get reduced jail time for being so damn good outside the pocket!
2007-08-19 10:47:05 · answer #8 · answered by freshmode87 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah & God bless the Romans for feeding the Christians to the lions. There's too many Christians running around anyways! ARE U CRAZY? I guess you probably thank Hitler & Charlie Manson for doing their part to avoid population overcrowding?
2007-08-19 13:22:40 · answer #9 · answered by Toe Cutter 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know Nick, lol--he's obviously either a troll or baiting or both-- just like 'oh so clean' in another post below--probably the same guy
2007-08-19 10:23:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hello? He raised them first.
are You from Waycross?!
2007-08-19 17:29:14 · answer #11 · answered by ny21tb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋