There is no way that the buildings collapsed due to planes, fire, or anything other than the reasons that any other building has ever collapsed--charges fired to deliberately weaken the structure and dynamite the building in a planned fashion.
What will it take to get the details, and to obtain the proper FEMA and NTSB investigations?
2007-08-19 10:59:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by nora22000 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
First off, Building 7 contained a power plant. That means there were big open areas inside so flames could move quickly. It also means that there was a lot of diesel fuel stored in the building. Diesel fuel is not all that much different than jet fuel. Both burn at 550 degrees F. Secondly, steel does not have to melt to lose its strength. Everyone seems to want to talk about the steel melting. It did not. But if you heat steel, it loses its temper and thus much of its strength. As an example, you can take a fairly large piece of steel rod and start bending it back and forth. When you first start, it is pretty hard to do, but as you keep doing it, you will find that you can bend it just a little bit more each time. At the same time, at the point where you are bending it, it gets warm. Keep it up and pretty soon you can break that rod right in half. Thirdly, many modern structures are made with weak links. Look at the bridge up in Minneapolis, MN that suddenly collapsed. One connector plate broke and when that went, the entire bridge fell down. Or the suspended bridges at the hotel in Kansas City. One weld joint gave and as a result, all the other weld joints gave way and both of the bridges fell, killing hundreds. Many modern buildings are like that also, built ONE FLOOR AT A TIME. Each floor has to support its own weight plus the weight of the floors above. If floor can not support itself, it goes and so does everything above it. Lastly, so you found a video of one building that did not fall down in a fire. According to the Architectural Engineers at the website below, the whole conspiracy thing is stupid.
2016-05-17 09:42:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by billie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep, people call us crazy libs or whatever they deem necessary to make their point apparent. Building 7 was 300ft away from the towers, and the Deutsche Bank building was parked up right against the towers and did not collapse from falling debris on 9/11 or collapse from the fire it had (the same kind of fire that the WTC towers endured, that being a hydrocarbon fire). Lets also mention the the tallest building in China burned for 7hrs and did not collapse while enduring huge raging fires in it. It did not collapse.
2007-08-19 14:59:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ted S 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Apparently we can present definitive proof that the WTC did not happen the way the powers that be have been trying to tell us. There is a gathering group of people who go around the world trying to tell people the the American government has been telling lies about 9-11. So many people keep their head in the sand and just dont want to deal with it. I spent the weekend with a nephew who's son was killed in the first towe. He firmly beleives that the WTC did not collapse because of any planes. He showed me proof positive. Why is it so hard for the general public to see the truth?
2007-08-19 10:43:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by phlada64 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Your talking the building seven - you mean the same one that english news channels reported collapsing 30 minutes before it actually collapsed??
It was rigged - dont believe everything that you see or hear from our government - they are a bunch of liars with their own agenda and will do anything to advance that agenda - soon it will be time for all of us to stand up and be ready to stop it all - hope eveyrone is prepared for that time when it comes
2007-08-20 12:51:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by jimkearney746 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, it appears that only buildings that burn on September 11 collapse because of fire.
2007-08-19 10:20:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
How silly.
That fire yesterday was nothing compared to the fires on 911. Of course that building didnt collapse.
Do some research other than on Google ok?
2007-08-19 10:05:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
You shouldnt be smokin in the building then, or eating muffins from Starbucks.
2007-08-19 14:07:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm convinced the libs out there who are answering this question with some sort of a conspiracy theory are completely out of their collective mind. Are you nut heads for real? Please tell me you people can't procreate. Please. Your gene pool is intensely scary and beginning to freak me out.
2007-08-19 11:21:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Wayne G 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Please tell me you will never be any kind of an investigator and go back to playing with your tonka trucks.
2007-08-19 10:57:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋