English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-19 08:10:11 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

With a choice like that, why don't you quit the Democrat party and vote for Ron Paul, the only honest man running?

2007-08-19 08:11:24 · update #1

14 answers

absolutely...and personally id rather have a root canal and apendectomy without anesthesia...it would be more pleasant.

2007-08-19 09:39:11 · answer #1 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 2

yes it is still choosing a evil, but Ron Paul is not any better so find a better choice and vote the candidate of your choice not the lesser of 3 evils.

2007-08-19 15:21:02 · answer #2 · answered by darrell m 5 · 1 2

I don't think either Obama or Hillary is "evil." In fact, if the election were today, I would vote for Obama. He's got a great message of unity and hope, and we can't change the way our government works if we don't occasionally elect people who haven't been involved in DC for a decade.

That said, philosophically speaking, choosing the lesser of two evils would still be choosing evil. And fighting an imaginary enemy is still a waste of energy.

2007-08-19 15:19:35 · answer #3 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 2 3

I think Ron Paul is a Libertarian Extremist who wants it to be 1776 again. He wants to dismantle the Federal Government, he supports Free Trade to the extreme. I don't like him at all.
By the way, he doesn't stand a chance for the Republican Nomination.
I'll take Hillary or Obama over any of the Republican Candidates.

2007-08-19 16:13:46 · answer #4 · answered by aspiring_paranormal_journalist 4 · 1 2

Ron Paul is quickly getting to the point on my list to where is right about up there with with a few other people I would like to see get blown up! I am so tired of hearing about RP and his no chance campaign. Wouldn't it be funny if he does decide to go all the way to the convention only to come in dead last and not even get a chance to address the crowd... I would pay for that!

2007-08-19 15:51:10 · answer #5 · answered by microbioguy 3 · 0 3

Neither of them are evil. And if you're trying to gain support for Ron Paul who isn't evil either, then you're going about it the wrong way. You can draw more flies with sugar.

2007-08-19 18:16:56 · answer #6 · answered by Lettie D 7 · 2 2

I'd have a hard time thinking anything was more evil then the last 7 years of GOP rule.

Did you know 911 changed everything and that's all Bill Clintons fault?

2007-08-19 15:22:46 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 3 2

If Americans had elected the ‘lesser’ instead of the ‘greater’ of two evils in last two Presidential elections, the nation would be in a lot better shape today.

2007-08-19 15:24:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

R. Paul is a wasted vote. He is only there to pull votes from the frontrunners on his ticket.

2007-08-19 15:19:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Yes it is. Whenever one says something stupid or offensive the other jumps in to provide worse. How have they tricked so many people?

2007-08-19 15:30:50 · answer #10 · answered by Dan 4 · 3 0

Vote for yourself since you know you are not evil!

2007-08-19 15:49:01 · answer #11 · answered by Max R Waller 3 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers