do you think that iraq / afganistan / bahrain / UAE... was a part of iran?

Question

and if it was a part of it once...who do you think splited it?

do you think that iraq is half iran?

do you think that iran will invade iraq once the us leaves?

do you think iran want to revenge for the 100000000 persians that died in the iran iraq war in 1989 and 1981?

also put your source please.
thanks

Answer 1

if u look at it just right the u.s. and iran are already at war i mean we're accusing them of training militants and supporting al queda and now they have sent 50 of their finest into iraq to train them its like the cold war u see the two sides are teasing each other but neither one wants to make the first move and have direct contact with the other so the militants are fighting for iran and killing the US troops and we're tracking the men from iran that are training the militants

Answer 2

If you're asking for "what do I think", there's no such thing as a "source" other than my own guesses.

No, Iraq, Afghanistan, Bahrain, etc. were never part of modern-day Iran. If you're suggesting that, at some point in history, historic Persia might have had dominion over many of these places, sure. So did Mongolia. Let's call Ulan Bator to come and take over Iran now. Or let's call the folks in Macedonia to retake Persia. I mean, if we go back in history, we can justify anything, but that's not sensible. Try to get over the past and just focus on the present, and let people live their own lives. Why do you need to take over another nation?

Answer 3

Your question would have the same implication as asking if most of Europe was once part of the Roman Empire and so it should all be united again under an Italian government. Italy doesn't equal Rome, and Iran doesn't equal Persia.

Answer 4

During the existence of the Persian Empire, all of Middle East was practically under the rule of the Ottomans (old Iraq).

Answer 5

it particularly is all hypocrisy, my chum. And all that American double-frequently happening that the U. S. be huge wakeful to diverse worldwide places. what form of super judgment is it, that its pronounced as an act of conflict mutually as diverse worldwide places do it, and yet mutually as the U. S. does the comparable factor, its now not an act of conflict?. in the technique the Soviet-Afghan conflict (1979-1989), the U. S. provided hands and money to the Afghan mujahedeens (that coated the Taliban and the group of Osama Bin weighted down) who've been battling against the Soviet troops on the time. isn't this an act of conflict?. in the technique the Iran-Iraq conflict (1980-1988), the U. S. provided hands (that coated fighter aircrafts, floor-to-air missiles and chemical weapons) to Saddam Hussein, which he used against Iranian troops. isn't this an act of conflict?. in the technique the Arab-Israeli conflict (Yom Kippur conflict, 1973), the U. S. provided aircrafts, missiles, and weapons to Israel. This US help for Israel made Saudi Arabia impose an oil-embargo that led to extreme gasoline rationing indoors the U. S.. Wasn't this US action an act of conflict?. in case you retain an open strategies and evaluate what the Iranians are doing now and what the U. S. have been doing indoors the previous, do you notice any distinction?. Now, take a closer look on the information, then ask the question decrease decrease back for your self. And to the poster above me who's attempting to justify US previous strikes via way of declaring that featuring hands to worldwide places with a "status national militia" isn't an act of conflict, top... his reasoning is warped and defies basic adventure. in case you undergo in strategies the "Iran-Contra Deal" of the late 80's, the situation the U. S. provided weapons to Iran and use the money to finance the Contra rebels of Nicaragua. The Contras are rebels or insurgents (and not Nicaragua's status national militia). And the extra advantageous extreme fact is that the U. S. provided weapons to Iran (which the U. S. had already in the previous declared as a unfavorable united states and u.s.'s sworn enemy). How could desire to you justify such strikes?.

Answer 6

Iran would be extremely foolish to invade Iraq

Answer 7

Antarctica and So America were once united also. Now, what was your the point of your question?

Answer 8

not yet, but soon they will be.