English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

You mean minority groups like the republicans?

2007-08-19 03:40:21 · answer #1 · answered by seizod 3 · 1 5

Are you suggesting that these groups should move to leverage their ability to abuse the welfare and government assistance programs? Sounds like typical Democrat brain storming. Maybe you should just get them to go to all the Republican campaign head quarters in swing states and slash the tires on their vehicles the day before voting. It would save the expense of them moving.

2007-08-19 10:57:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

No, they should disperse for the same reason. They'd get attention from a larger number of politicians that way.

2007-08-19 10:46:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I thought that's why Bush sent Katrina to New Orleans.

2007-08-19 11:04:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

they've had this opportunity for years or decades

the people have voted with their feet and the answer is "no".


economic opportunity -- jobs, in short -- has trumped this notion long ago.


:-)

2007-08-19 10:45:33 · answer #5 · answered by Spock (rhp) 7 · 2 0

There is so much cynicism dripping from this question like acid that I almost didn't want to touch it.

No, they shouldn't. What "concessions" ?

2007-08-19 10:44:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

You mean like they do to get better state welfare benefits?

Why not?

2007-08-19 10:41:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

It sounds unethical.

2007-08-19 13:30:27 · answer #8 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0 1

The only thing that they will get is promises....

2007-08-19 11:52:03 · answer #9 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 0 1

They should relocate back to their own country... my opinion.........

2007-08-19 10:41:41 · answer #10 · answered by docie555@yahoo.com 5 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers