Why can't Republicans admit that Bush is a Failure?

Answer 1

The hatred of Bush is really your hatred of capitalism but somehow and some way, you can't or won't admit.

Socialists believe anyone who is a capitalist icon is stupid, greedy, evil, etc. You claim to support and represent the poor but what you actually do, is exploit their position in life to further your own power. If liberals really cared about poor people, you would not appoint false leaders like Sharpton and Jackson. These charlatans are your partners in crime to undermine our way of life (so you can replace it with socialism).

Liberals love to impose horrific handicaps on our economy and then tell us why capitalism doesn't work. Well, it wasn't designed for trial lawyers to prey on the medical community (you cry about socialized medicine, yet you support the trial lawyers filling up our courts with frivolous law suits and "lottery winning" jury awards) Liberals love to raise the minimum wage to make the USA uncompetitive with other countries.
Liberals love to impose taxes and change tax laws where only 1/2 the population pays income tax.

We know where your hatred breeds, it's socialism and the over-throw of our way of life. I'm sure you are looking forward to the day when the USA is no longer the world power; yeah, we know you don't think we deserve it do you, comrade?

Answer 2

Why can't Dems admit that Bill Clinton got a BJ in the oval office? And that he is the cause of 9-11? You think Bush is a failure? Do some research on Bill Clinton's presidency before coming on here and ranting about Bush!

Answer 3

When will you get any political party anywhere admitting any kind of failure, unless the failure is so evident that it can't be denied? One side of the argument is that there are still enough people around in the US, & around the world, who believe that Bush's government has not failed so much as been beset by huge obstacles to its national security & trading interests, & that it has not yet had time enough to overcome those.

For GWB himself, his time in the White House is finished. He can't stand again, so the party itself probably feels that it doesn't need to admit any failure. While they probably would like more terms in office, with a new figurehead, they may well be looking forward to a spell of Democratic government.

Prior to the 20th century, the Republican party was the party of social reform & economy management. The Democrats were the party that played to vested interest. Some time in the early 20th century they switched philosophies. Through the 20th century the Democrats has become the party of social reform & direct management of the national economy, a policy that has brought the US out of recession & depression & built it up, by their social reforms & their aggressive external (foreign) trade policies.

Answer 4

If he WERE a failure, I guess they would. But he hasn't been a failure. The economy is strong, and he is doing what he can to stop terrorism.

How could Bush be termed a "failure"? It's one thing not to LIKE a president, but that doesn't mean he's a failure. It just means you don't like him.

Love Jack

Answer 5

Your premise is only undeniable incorrect. Please assessment the chart decrease than. of course you will see that the version between Bush and Obama's physique of ideas. enable me walk you alongside the path of present day-day historic previous. save on with alongside with the chart decrease than. we start up up in 2000 with a money surplus. the concentration of the Bush administration is Social danger-loose practices Reform. Surplus keeps into 2001. yet then the 9/11 assaults happen. the concentration of the country turns to danger-loose practices. 2002 we discover ourselves in a deficit. it quite is by skill of technique of all of the possibility-loose practices measures put in place and the creation of the dep. of place of start up danger-loose practices. 2003 the conflict in Iraq resumes and the conflict in Afghanistan start up up. (with bipartisan help, i ought to upload). We see a spike interior the deficit. 2004 the Iraq conflict is in finished swing the deficit is at its height. Then employing actuality the conflict winds down, we see a cut back interior the deficit beginning up in 2005 and continuing downward till 2008. yet then the financial disaster hits. The "restoration" is the TARP bailout, with bipartisan help. yet, it quite is a one shot deal. The money for 2009 does not contain this expenditure. yet look at the deficit for 2009! What the heck? That, my chum is Obama's money. It does not contain any of the sole time TARP payout. That already occurred. it quite is only the doing of the Democrat super Majority and Obama. This reflects the Stimulus equipment. yet optimal severely, there is quite not something faster or later projections to even recommend returning to stability. in fact the White residing abode's very own projections are for ever increasing deficits as a brilliant way employing actuality the chart is going. How might desire to truthfully everyone ever even recommend that this financial disaster has something to do with Bush or the Republican social gathering? How do you're making that bounce? I do purely not see it. *

Answer 6

Mr. Bush is not a failure. He has done some things very well and some things I don't agree with. If you think you can do better, get elected President.

Answer 7

Bush may not be the best Republican president we've ever had. But, the worst conservative is still better than the best left wing socialist Dem.

Answer 8

I cannot understand why the earth has not swallowed this man up, as he a hypocrite, a liar, a deceiver, and a disgrace to every life form in the earth. It is astonishing that you never hear people calling this despot an utter and complete failure in everything he ever tried to do.

The Republican party have fallen for his sorcery, and will follow him to hell. The doctrine of The Great Deceiver and Great Divider has nearly destroyed the earth.

Answer 9

It would be admitting they are a failure for backing him and no one likes to admit when they are wrong, especially republicans it seems.

Answer 10

Perhaps they are hoping to get another village idiot elected. Two Terms of Mass Destruction weren't enough, there are still some jobs left.