human cloning?

Question

wat is the difference of a cloned human and his origin and twins? is human cloning a bad idea?

Answer 1

One day in the not so distant future, people will come to realize that it was a serious mistake to not have developed and perfected techniques in human cloning. We really can't say too much about if human cloning is a bad thing or not, since no human clones have been created (that we know of) to evaluate. Some think that human cloning is just the same as human pseudo-clones, twins. Not likely, in my opinion. We see significant commonality between human pseudo-clones, how much more commonality will we discover between a true human clone and the genomic donar---a great deal, most likely. The reason for that is: donor DNA when transferred into an enucleated egg, isn't the same as that of normal fertilization. (It has to do with quantum physics, quantum consciousness, and holographic models or the mind). Donated DNA is reprogrammed by egg cell's cytoplasm back to a stage more similar to that of embryonic stem cells than that of a fully undifferentiated state like fertilization. Otherwise, fetal development remain the same as with fertilization. In short, there may be far more commonality between a clone and their genetic donor than with common pseudo-clones. The potential is enormous. However, the abuse that can come from human cloning is also enormous. Human cloning has the potential to literally destroy old established social, political, and religious institutions. Which is why, in my opinion, there was such a heavy-handed push by governments to have human cloning ban world-wide. Human cloning is indeed far more than creating a "delayed" twin.

Answer 2

Human cloning is just duplicating a human, just like making a copy a a certain file in your computer.

It is categorized into many forms, like cloning where the duplicate has no memory or knowledge, or a duplicate where the duplicate would believe that he or she is the original person, and would take the social status and identity of the original person.

It is a bad idea, as it is not natural, and it will complicate the social category of humans. Cloning does not help in medication as it does not serve as a transplant for someone as the DNA is same, and the injuries or ailments would appear on both specimens of a certain being.

Answer 3

natural cloning results in twins. since it is natural the 2 clones are stable.

but in human cloning we use the present DNA to produce embryo bearing the same DNA pattern. one problem is that since we use old DNA that is existing one the DNA strands are not replenished * the resulting clone may have some diseases too.

this is the reason why inbreeding is bad. 2 persons having the same set of chromosomes produce an offspring which has almost the same chromosomal pattern hence the child may suffer from several diseases.

human cloning is a bad idea but cloning organs is not. it can help save many lives.

Answer 4

From what I remember the Clone does not have a long life span. I not remember the sheep's name, but, when it died they spoke of the life span of clones. Also, there are moral implications society see. Clone yourself some body parts and then you know they compatible. Need a heart? Kill your clone and take it. Then make another clone for the next time.

Answer 5

Well with a clon you get the original DNA of a person and put it inside a cytoplasm and put inside.. a 'cloned person' and when it comes to twins sometimes the DNA is different from eachother, so technacly they are not the same.
We are allowed to clon human beings, but since it's against the law, we dont.

Idk if this helped.

Answer 6

if clones have been ever made criminal for despite the fact that reason, i think of they could desire to be dealt with with the comparable comprehend given to the unique guy or woman. being a clone dosent recommend which you cant sense thoughts, and with thoughts the clone turns into mroe complicated and not in basic terms a standard replica of somebody anymore, it turns into yet another guy or woman, somebody else who became destined to stay in simple terms not by way of organic childbirth. it would be un-ethical to handle them as spare aspects or slaves, for whether they are copies they are nonetheless human.

Answer 7

I think that a haman clone would have no sole and twins are a act of God so they have a sole. But that just what I think.

Answer 8

yeah it's not natural!