English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Yes

The Israelis have the right idea with 2 years cumpulsory military service for every able-bodied citizen. We would be wise to follow this example

2007-08-18 23:31:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

all of it comes right down to money. The scientific reward by myself that are granted to congressmen and senators are so gracious that it may be economically impossible to bestow those reward on each and every of the ladies and adult adult males who've served in uniform. i can not blame them, although. If i grew to become into finding out on a scientific plan for myself and did no longer might desire to pay for it i could in all likelihood %. the applicable one with the main reward, too. this is atrocious how poorly veterans are taken care of in this united states, although. nicely, no longer via maximum individuals of the fundamental human beings here, yet via the representation in Washington. There are some reliable human beings in government, yet you never hear approximately them because of the fact the media could somewhat coach scandals and bash Republicans.

2016-12-13 12:05:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes they should be, with a few exceptions like John Murtha and John Kerry who have taken strong anti-war and anti-troops stances. I think it would help, though, if all of them were veterans who at least have been there.

2007-08-19 08:02:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think anyone who has any control of the military should have some military experience. The President and members of the Armed Forces Committee. Im not saying all members of congress need military experience, just those that involve themselves directly in military affairs.

2007-08-18 23:19:39 · answer #4 · answered by mnbvcxz52773 7 · 5 2

service = citizenship? good movie all the dead bugs and all.
but seriously why not have some military back ground if you hold a position like military affairs or the armed services committee

2007-08-19 01:11:08 · answer #5 · answered by beanerjr 5 · 2 1

The democrats have stated that GW has no right to send in troops as he was AWOL Even tho he was not.

So YES they should have served. And since that is the case madam hillary should be REMOVED .

2007-08-19 09:17:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Unfortunately Paul, as all us vets know...Their are fewer and fewer vets in the congress!!! They are too busy in their early years trying to build a political career instead of serving their country

2007-08-19 11:27:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

That'd be good for a change except some of these veterans appear to have suffered brain damage (i.e. Kerry, Gore)

2007-08-19 00:45:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

i would think it certainly would be helpful in understand what the military faces and needs. i can see some concerns by i think the benefits would exceed the possible problems.

Perhaps then they could understand that leaks should not happen that jeopardize us all nor request information that is critical to our national defense.

2007-08-19 01:24:14 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 3 1

Without a doubt...logically one cannot direct/appropriate the activities of any group without having first hand knowledge of the inner workings of that group.

2007-08-19 00:38:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers