Is there any exception to this rule?

Question

Nothing will be X if X cannot be thought as "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, link, limit, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, and fulfillment."
.
.
.
Nothing will be one if one cannot be thought as "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, link, limit, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, and fulfillment."

Source: http://predictor.awardspace.com

Answer 1

there is no such thing as nothing.
You are asking a question (which you have asked often) that can't be answered because the answer is based on assumptions.
In Japan there is a word Mu. Which means that there is no answer becasue there is no queston.
Nothing is the absensce of everythig, thus can't be part of anything.

I still can't understand why you go over and over and over the same question.

Answer 2

I think the person who wrote that was suffering form diarrhea of the brain. :)

Look, forget all that crap.

Everything just is unless it isn't.

Now go outside and get some sun. All philosophy is the chirping of crickets.

Answer 3

Nothing cannot be, except in theory, wherein nothing takes on the substance of something and therefore negates its own existence. Nothing is nothing only when not thought of as something. Abstract reasoning of nothing as nothing set aside of something still represents something and therefore cannot be nothing.....

SO...

Nothing and nothing is nothing unless that nothing is something that nothing can affect, count or otherwise quantify... but remains nothing until it is noticed and becomes something and not nothing.

Answer 4

Exceptions test and disprove "rules".

Find a rule with no exceptions and you have something useful.
///

Answer 5

can one be part AND whole, origin AND derivative?

Answer 6

'cannot be' is an exception and difference, not a rule.

The Will is positive, the Judgment is negative.

Answer 7

And your point is?