2007-08-18
18:15:14
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Tony
4
in
News & Events
➔ Media & Journalism
Please excuse me, I wrote "2007" but, of course I wanted write "2001"...
2007-08-18
18:29:01 ·
update #1
Sorry, if you do not have included details.. http://www.disinformazione.it/911_complotto_cia_e_marina.htm in this site, there is both Italian and English, explained another version of events... I ask you what you think of this page...... Hello
2007-08-18
18:33:06 ·
update #2
please read http://0911.site.voila.fr/index.htm
too
2007-08-18
18:37:02 ·
update #3
I will not acknowledge the USA with this question, I have read randomly these sites, and then I thought to ask you in "answers". perhaps some of you, can help me to understand better...... Thank you!!!
2007-08-18
18:39:39 ·
update #4
I believe that at a minimum Bush (or at least the people who control him) knew about an impending attack and intentionally did nothing to stop it. Whether this criminal administration was involved in planning and executing the attack is unknown at this point. Our government has not yet conducted a legitimate investigation.
In the very unlikely event that no one in the administration was involved or had advance knowledge, these evil people certainly were capable of doing it. Just look at Hurricane Katrina as an example. They had no concern for the people affected before, during, or after the hurricane. They are trying to kick out people that are living in FEMA trailers and make them homeless. Many of the trailers still in use were illegally lined with formaldehyde, and the residents are getting sick from it and Bush couldn't care one bit.
Our country is being run by a group of evil psychopathic mass murderers who enjoy killing and destruction, even if the dead are Americans. While we don't have any proof as to Bush's involvement, anyone who thinks they couldn't have possibly done it has their head in the sand.
2007-08-18 21:34:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alan S 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
The theory that 9/11 was the work of religious fundamentalists working out of Afganistan with the political goal of forcing the United States out of the Middle East is supported by the proponderance of evidence, both phsyical and eyewitness. No other theory is supported by the evidence, so... Which begs the question, where is this evidence of an inside job? I have yet to encounter anyone who made such a claim who had evidence that couldn't be utterly refuted in a matter of minutes. Not once. The "inside job" theories (of which there are about 50 and they can not all be right) are in fact so easy to refute to anyone with even moderate cognitive skills that it isn't even fun anymore. I issue to you the same challenge than I do all "truthers". If your evidence is so convincing, bring it into a court of law.
2016-05-17 05:46:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't believe we've been told the whole truth, no. One thing I have always wondered about was how did this happened when the US government seem to have known so much about the "terrorists", where they lived, where they came from, etc. and all the flying lessons they took.... why weren't those people followed and this tragedy prevented? It's inhuman to think that one government or organisation could have planned to such detail and executed such a devastating plan.... however, why should it be more credible that "someone else" did it but not the US?
I guess we will never know Tony.. we can speculate, guess, debate and try to understand, but the only true fatct is that, sadly, we will never know.
2007-08-18 20:25:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I don't really get why the United states government would allow thousands of innocent people to be slaughtered. If they were behind it then why bother going to war with Afghanistan? Bush wanted a war with Iraq for the oil but why would anyone want to waste their time trying to hunt down Bin Laden? It doesn't really make much sense to me as a government cover up so I think that I'll go with the governments version of events myself.....Probably a first with my way of thinking though.
2007-08-18 19:09:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Too many things have come out regarding all of the nasty little political problems, situations, etc. that lead me to believe there is far more than they are "trusting" the public with knowing in regards to the 9/11 bombings. After Oliver North named Osama BL as the person he most feared all of those years ago...there is more going on here.
2007-08-18 18:26:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tibbar 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually I cant believe the official version because clearly it was caused by mor mons thats right the correct answer is the mormon religion. See it all started at the council of mitt. They needed a distraction from their world domination plans so they created spaceships that looked like United airlines airplanes complete with haligraphic images of actual passengers who right before the crash into the towers were flown to the bermuda triangle and live in an under sea society that the government is trying to hide as we all know when global warming takes over we will all have to live in an under the sea society . So anyway as I was saying the mor mon religion who by the way is the secret one true religion of course had these crafts explode into the building the pilots who were pygmie illegal aliens ejected right before impact to not be found in the wreckage
Meanwhile back at Super Best Friend Headquarters jesus was asking moses how to stop david blaine from making Blainetology a religion
This looks like a job for the Hardley Boys
Your question cracked me up I had to throw down a paraphrase of south park enjoy its as entertaining as the 911 is an inside job story silly
2007-08-18 18:37:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
For the most part yes. There will of course be some details which for various reasons the American intelligence services do not want ( quite rightly )published but in the main the most open society in the world is being open and truthful one more.
2007-08-18 18:32:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
NO. How would two buildings fall into their basements and not over the surrounding area if not demolished. Terrorists are just the excuse for an illegal invasion. From what I have seen the buildings needed to be nearly demolished to have the asbestos removed so that it would be cheaper and, of course the insurance can be claimed, more profitable to demolish. The government had to have deaths to make an attack on Afghanistan and Iraq palatable to the American people.
2007-08-18 18:48:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
Absolutely. Anyone who doesn't, or thinks there was some kind of big conspiracy, isn't looking at all the facts and pictures and listening to the people who were there. Do you really think that some great scheme was hatched and dispatched to kill 3,000+ civilians on our own soil, by our own government, and no one involved has spoken up by now. the evidence is overwhelming. I can't stand listening to people who come up with this crap just to get their 15 minutes of fame.
Let's focus on the people who did this, and make them pay, instead of fighting amongst ourselves.
2007-08-18 18:25:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by ChefMattEgg 1
·
5⤊
4⤋
1 I see no reason not to
2 I have other things to do
2007-08-18 22:14:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Canute 6
·
1⤊
1⤋