I second that emotion! Very observant but the mentalcases are speechless and cannot possibly come up with a lucid answer for this you watch!
2007-08-18 17:22:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by brenda r 3
·
3⤊
5⤋
In super area, confident. not completely. once you're massive, you charm to interest. that's in simple terms the way it quite is. So some anti-American sentiment is often going to be there. look at the protests approximately China - that in simple terms is going to coach they are transforming into a real potential. truthfully everyone seems to be now taking word of what they are doing. no one's vastly protesting Burma, even however their government is a lot worse. there is a few people who will blame united statesa. no count what it does. This being suggested, maximum truthfully everyone seems to be greater effective than that and persons in many circumstances desire united statesa. while that's not performing unilaterally - it alleviates the terror united statesa. is performing like an imperial potential. the answer (to this actual problem) is to elect a greater diplomatic president. individuals love a sturdy chief. regrettably, sturdy leaders are many times perceived as bullies decrease than the incorrect circumstances.
2016-11-12 21:17:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
FIRST OFF... you're asking FIVE questions...
so it's KIND of hard to answer the EXACT question... when there are five of them... how about asking A SINGLE EXACT QUESTION before you cry that people aren't answering you?
but to your first question... they do say things... I've heard liberals talk bad against Castro, Aheninijad (or what ever his name is in Iran), Hugo Chavez and more...
some applauded Chavez early on... many thought he could be a good leader... but then he turned out to be little more than a tyrant... which is disappointing... the world doesn't need another dictator...
I think all those you mention, including Bush, have quite a bit in common... granted, Bush isn't as bad as many of them... but I don't live in those other countries... and I think it's reasonable to be a little more focused on your own nation that everyone else's...
2007-08-18 17:27:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
I agree with "they watch you". I was totally ignorant to politics until May day 2006 when I saw illegals and communist parading down our streets calling Americans names and demanding we leave this continent as they also demanded we make them legal while waving their countries flags in our faces. Does everyone realize our gubermint approved of the communist action in our streets? Them and the communist ACLU flipped us off and said they have a right to free speech and expression. Let Americans parade down our streets demanding the communist and illegals leave this continent and see what happens to us.
Since then I've done a mountain of research, found out, do NOT trust the media or politicians!
I was a democrat who was sickened by the Clintons, so much so that I voted for Bush both times. Only after doing extensive research (unfortunately after it was to late) did I realize the Bushes and Clintons and just about all politicians fell off the same political tree. I'm no longer affiliated with any political party and refuse to donate a dime to any party. When and if I do donate it's to a person NOT party.
I don't care who's a dictator in another country. I only concern myself with that if they start giving orders to us. Bush a dictator? He's a wanna be but if he follows through with executive orders he has in place, he WILL become one. For that matter anyone that becomes president after him, if he hasn't already done so, they probably will not only use his executive orders but will make ones of their own.
2007-08-18 18:26:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by humm 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
OK, first of all, as you sit there and act as if you've got it all figured out, believing that you are really sticking to the idiot liberals this time... bla, bla, bla
Look... It's time that Americans wake the %*$@ up and realize that there is no such thing as a two party system anymore (even though it is supposed to be multi-party). This rediculous false left-right paradigm has been a thing of the past for decades, yet people continue to argue and chastize each other as if they are defending the republic from a bitter enemy while praising the beautiful red or blue state with which they so diligently adorn.
Those of you who are going to respond to this brainwashed question with a brainwashed response, either in agreement or opposition, you are sadly submitting to the unfortunate reality of political ignorance without regard for knowing why you are even arguing in the first place.
Instead, we need to band together, study the current and recent administrations, their directives, executive orders, voting records, and everything these people do behind our backs while we nedlessly argue like children, trivializing the very essence of why we are having the discussion in the first place!
It is with total discontent as I acknowledge that it is because of political leaders from both parties tirelessly signing orders to weaken the framework of our constitution on a regular basis, creating and funding state sponsored terrorist acts, and setting the stage for total tyranny, supression, and martial law.
Unless you are not concerned with your freedom to argue these idiotic and trivial points, I suggest you find the time to research the facts, and actually independently study the realities of world politics before you continue to spew the same garbage you heard on fox news, cnn, or msnbc.
2007-08-18 17:16:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by ConspiracyExaminer 3
·
2⤊
4⤋
I have NEVER called him a dictator. I have suggested he would like to be one.
I don't know of any Liberal who supports anyone of the people, no, I take that back, any dictator in power right now. And anyone who does, should be ashamed of themselves, but guess what? That's their right. And right now, I am more concerned about what is happening with our country, here at home.
Who supported Iran, Iraq and bin Laden in the 1980's? And it wasn't a Liberal was it?
Who left Saddam, a known dictator, in power when we had a great chance of getting him out? And now look.
People in glass houses don't throw stones.
2007-08-18 19:05:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by angelpuppyeyes 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
Hey dude, I don't bother myself with the leaders of other countries. I'm an American, so I care most about my own country and its citizens. I care what happens to our Constitution, I care about the effect political decisions and governmental policies have on our daily lives, and I care when one president drives our country into a ditch. I leave it to the Cubans, the Venezuelans, Saudi Arabians or whoever to care about their own country and fix the problems they've got. See? I live here, so I try to address the problems HERE.
Why don't you love our country?
2007-08-18 18:18:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
You are characterizing the left wing.
Many people, on both sides of the political spectrum, are against the current administration because they are defecating on the constitution.
This is not a partisan issue.
It is an issue of freedom and liberty.
2007-08-18 18:58:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't "cheer and applaud" any dictator. I do think that America needs to re-establish itself as a free and safe nation with a government of, by and for the people before we go poking through everybody else's dirty laundry.
2007-08-18 17:25:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Barrabas_6025 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
I don't applaud or approve of any of the dictators you mentioned. However, none of them are President of the country I live in. Painting all Liberals with the same brush is like saying all Conservatives are skinheads.
2007-08-18 17:47:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by dasupr 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
Nice.. it depends on the way they handle their people and also.. the way people react.. Like in singapore, we know its like communist dictatorship.. and look at them.. very developed..
it just depends on how people react to it and how the leader imposed much rules...
and with that, we must accept the fact that not all person, agrees with the idea or principle of another.. social realism..
2007-08-18 17:23:09
·
answer #11
·
answered by Pi 3
·
2⤊
2⤋