English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

Just responding to a couple of Leather-so-softs answers.

The moon doesn't affect waves, it affects tides, which are completely different. Tides change because of the moon, but only when its high tide and low tide. Waves are generated almost only by winds, but also the shape of the land below the ocean. The moon does not really affect waves.

Second, we wouldn't visit the moon more, unless the moon was right on top of earth, which would be disastrous for a lot of reasons. Most of the reason we don't visit the moon is because it's unsafe to travel through the Van Allen radiation belt, and the landing and excursions on the moon are dangerous because of all the things that could go wrong. In-space flight between the radiation belt and the moon is not a big problem, and this would be the only thing that would vary for flights.

Other than that he's right. The tides would be way off, it'd be possible to have high tides many times a day, instead of two. And the view would be really messed up.

2007-08-18 17:44:20 · answer #1 · answered by Jon G 4 · 0 0

This has replace into between the quite massive questions interior the final couple of an prolonged time. The moon motives tides on earth that have been lots bigger while existence first began. Many have self assurance it became this cycle which enabled complicated molecules to kind. if it is so, then existence could be an exceedingly uncommon prevalence. If we did not have the moon, it ought to be that the sea might in simple terms be full of a few elementary organic and organic compounds and probably some very short polymers and amino acids. Nucleic acids and proteins could have been impossible without the moon. isn't it ironic, however? it would be yet another occasion of ways bigger existence varieties does not have developed without some disaster. Edit: i won't be able to confirm Ziggle's first declare. not one of the standards seems to have any connection to the others. Water international? properly, possibly. So what? Moon collision? ok, what did which could do with the water? Humanity ensuing? How?

2016-11-12 21:17:25 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

We would have bigger waves, meaning more dangerous hurricanes and etc. The moon controls how high the waves are at times of the day. Depending on where it was, some nights would be a lot brighter than usual. The moon is bright because it reflects the suns' rays that we cannot see to earth, and if both moons were at the same side of the world, we'd have double the light at night.The gravity would differ. We'd have more competition from Russia. The chances of viewing a Solar/Lunar eclipse would increase by two times. If it was closer than our current moon, We would probably have a lot more people visiting the moon.

2007-08-18 17:26:22 · answer #3 · answered by Change of Venue (Not In Use) 5 · 0 2

they say that the moon affects the gravity we have here on earth, so i bet that would change.

2007-08-18 17:16:08 · answer #4 · answered by jujubeee 4 · 0 1

It would be a great place to visit, but I would not want to live there.

2007-08-18 17:14:19 · answer #5 · answered by Bomba 7 · 0 0

That, sir, is pure lunacy.

2007-08-18 17:22:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers