In Indian Idol 3 , do you endorse the behaviour of some judges; particularly with Anu Malik becoming dictator?

Question

The Indian Idol - Version 3 on Sony TV is becoming a big farce. Some of the judges have been behaving very very crude and with a 'what do we care about the viewing public' attitude.They are playing gods openly ridiculing the voting patterns of the public. These are men who have come up with the patronage of the public and they are forgetting all norms of decency in criticising the same very public.

The talented young girls and boys are subjected to public humiliation and traumatisation . How is it less than ragging in professional colleges with freshers? When The Supreme court
took up ragging seriously , probly it is time the cruelty in public gaze is considered being stopped forthwith.

The vulgarities of the cinema field are fully coming out how some influential people bully the co - artists and also the freshers. Even the implied suggestions of casting couch can't be missed with the way some of the girl participants have buckled under the intense pressures.

Concept of the Indian Idol programme is adopted from the American Idol programme which is well conducted. In our own country , the' Meri Awaz Suno 'music competition was almost single handedly conducted by Anu Kapoor and the programme was instantly very popular with the public and the culmination was a new star , namely, Sunidhi Chauhan, who has tremendous potential to rise to very great hights has risen on the horizon . Other programmes like Sonu Nigam anchored "sarigama" and lateron "sarigamapa" and now the Voice of India programme on Star Plus.

The vulgarity of the behaviour of judges greatly hurt the sentiments of the viewing public, not to mention the contorted faces of the young participants, their relations and other well wishers.The judges are treating as a purely private matter, all at the expence of viewing public's money, time and hurt feelings.
It is time the bluff is called and the bullying stopped..
Amitab Bachan anchored the KBC programme programme with dignity .

Answer 1

any one who speaks his/her mind clearly is termed as crude or arrogant. what is the use of a judge if he/she sugar coats what ever he wants to say and give false hopes to participants. Udit Narayn has not taken a clear stand for any of the participants so far. what is the use of his being there. secondaly all these senior persons are follwing the dictates of the director of the series to create some drama. if every thing was so right the programme will become a bore. i am watching voice of india now, same drama is going on between abhijeet and adesh over abhilasha. dont forget it is all a part of the showI have something different to say. If the candidates have to win and lose because of public votes, let the public vote for what pleases their ears and ignore the dramatics/views of thesejudges . if anu malik likes a particular dish in his meals, if does not mean every one else would like to eat the same stuff. he may like ms a or mr a , but that is not important to me, i would like to vote for the participant who pleases my senses ( hearing ) more.
Let me say again,( sorry for repeating )please judege the participants from your ears,brain and heart andnot by what the judges say. For example Anu Maliks is what he is today because public, like u and me liked his work. Forget the created dramatics of the serials/shows

Answer 2

I do not think Anu Malik is any dictator. Rather, I see some bias in the behaviour of Alisha. Everyone has freedom to give opinions. If the judges criticise the public, what is problem? They have a right give their opinions. The public many times criticises celebrities without sufficient reason. So, what is the problem if celebrities criticise the public. Such criticisms and counter-criticisms will always exist. They should not be taken seriously.

Yes, previously, Anu Malik was mistreating the candidates. I also criticised him then. But, at present, he does not do so, as I observe. These criticisms cannot be called ragging. Anyone who rises high will face such things anyway. Rising high is not that easy. Only those who have strength to bear criticisms can rise.

The judges have not come to their present position by the mercy of the public. They have come there by the mercy of God and their own destinies.

Answer 3

All this is sheer lies,judges quarelling and all,just to attract attention of T.V. viewers.

Answer 4

no