Saddam Hussain or George Bush ? Total number civilians and military...... seams to me there were no suicide bombers and insurgents running around before Bush gave the country democracy
2007-08-18 15:26:37 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Saddam, as evil and creepy he was, he knew the only way to control Iraq, was through dictatorship.
Then, there goes bushy, a macho, brainless, maladroit cow boy who believes, he's above the law, thus starts a civil war in order to steal some OIL!
This civil war will go on for ever and ever and guess who will be responsible for all the deaths to come? BUSH.
2007-08-18 15:35:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 8⤋
It must Suck when you try a loaded questions and most resposes back fire on you. Go back to the Daily Kos, or e-mail George Soros, or John Edwards.
During the Saddam's time as Dictator of Iraq, he did the following,
Invaded His Neighbor we call that The Gulf war
Gassed his own People, with mustard gas
Straved and Brutally ruled his people with terror,
VIOLATED 17 U.N. LAWS FOR 17 YEARS!!!
Refused to allow U.N. WEAPONS INspectors to do there job
Was Bombed in 98 by Clinton with the same intell Bush and CONGRESS HAD TO INVADE.
His savagely beat and killed who ever opposed him
Bought weapons with oil money from France and Russia that was supossed to feed his people.
HARBORED TERRORISTS CAMPS AND WAS A STATE SPONSOR OF TERRORISM OF THE WEST.
Had plot to Kill George Bush our President
Also Bill Clinton said he was sure Saddam had WMD's congress voted on it with the same intell Bush had. Military Intell is the best possible info at the time, and saddam had Mustard Gas which is a WMD.
Is that enough reasons for you
Yeah we should have let Saddam stay in power he was a GREAT GUY, glad he is dead, and most sane people are.
2007-08-18 15:38:28 · answer #2 · answered by dez604 5 · 9⤊ 3⤋
I thought about this Que. for some minutes and i could not come clean with Bush.
Bush's hands are bloody as Saddam's were.
If Iraq's war and civil war doesn't end very soon, i guess Bush will be on top of the list.
ADD: There're some hilarious responses here. Like, how much cash Saddam wasted instead of feeding his people!!HA!
Bush's war has cost us $4 trill. so far. SOME OF YOU geniuses explains the difference here!!
2007-08-18 15:55:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
What the heck is a president for if to no longer be in charge and in charge for overseeing the enhanced mauneuvers taken via this us of a...??? Jesus human beings!! He did no longer kill them one via one together with his very own palms... he only made the alternative... and that makes him accountable. Saddamn Hussein did no longer kill all of those those together with his very own palms... yet we nonetheless carry him in charge... how is it irrational to grant Bush the comparable accountability??? And NO of course Bush isn't in charge for all the deaths in Iraq... yet needless to say you human beings are lacking the ingredient of the question!
2016-10-10 12:34:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam and his legacy of killing has been continued by other Iraqis and Middle Easterners since our arrival in Iraq.
If you think the high death toll has accumulated at American hands, you are wrong and it is pure fallacy to blame Bush for the actions of others.
2007-08-18 15:45:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
BUSH.
Some may say Saddam, but the death toll is not finish yet.
Considering all the lost since day one, because of bushs action i might add and god knows how many thousands of innocents will be killed in future and civil war. I definitely say bush.
2007-08-18 15:47:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
No, they were wiping them out by the village full and you may recall all the mass graves. So Saddam is still the winner.
2007-08-18 15:45:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
George Bush.
Though not intentionally -- if you are watching too much of Law & Order, you may find him guilty of 'Negligent homicide' or 'First-degree manslaughter'.
2007-08-18 18:29:00 · answer #8 · answered by I could care less 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Seems to me that you are right... but the morons who STILL hold out for this guy would want to tell you something different in face of all the facts.
2007-08-18 16:17:00 · answer #9 · answered by Blessed 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Those people in Iraq that will not stand up and unite to show that they refuse to take it anymore .
If you are not willing to get in the fight and stand up then you are a loser and nothing anyone does for you can change that .
We should have left a long time ago and let those people battle it out among themselves .
2007-08-18 15:38:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋