If Bill would have just behaved himself, Al Gore would have won the 2000 election hands down. I'm a little upset with him for that myself.
2007-08-18 11:37:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
Well, first you have to accept that your assessment of the current administration is true...which I don't.
But from a larger perspective, IF Clinton didn't exist, would we still have shown no backbone in responding to earlier terrorist attacks on our assets? IF Clinton didn't exist, would Bin Laden have been so appalled that an American leader would have shown the moral sensibilities of a stray dog...something abhorrent to a fundamentalist.? IF Clinton didn't exist and Americans didn't retreat from Mogadishu, would Bin Laden have assessed us as being too weak to respond to a direct attack? If Clinton didn't exist and another president had been offered Bin Laden, would 9/11 have been possible?
No one will ever know the answer to these "what-if's", but the Republicans would probably not have to be working so hard at keeping America safe today.
2007-08-18 13:06:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes if they didn't have Clinton they would no doubt blame another Democrat.
Republican hate for Bill Clinton comes from jealousy and resentment.They tried to smear the man from before he was president throughout his whole presidency ,with as an absolute low point the fraudulent impeachment,and they will continue till after he is dead probably.They can't grasp why their propaganda doesn't work on Bill like it did and does on most other Democrats,think of Kerry and or Dean.This frustration explains their obsession.
2007-08-18 12:30:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because all you liberals point out things about Bush, but when a conservative points out the exact same thing a liberal did, you get all antsy. By the way... Clinton sent troops into Somalia, Clinton bombed Iraq, Clinton got us involved in the Balkans... ohhhh but I forgot, those were "legal" because he was a liberal. Why dont you grow up instead of making ignorant comments?? By using your own logic, then clinton sent soldiers to die in an "illegal war". Also, it wouldnt be nessecary for Republicans to "invent" Clinton, because of the fact that liberals say so many idiotic things, we dont need to "invent" anyone.
2007-08-18 11:47:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Blake 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
You truly are a little boy, with a little boy brain and a little boy puppy and a little boy bag of marbles, caught in an adult world, and son, that truly perplexes you, doesn't it?
Did Daddy tell you that Mr Clinton was a good man, or did Johnny across the street say it while you were at the park? You obviously haven't matured enough to be cognizant of your own thoughts yet, so surely someone else has told you when, what and how to think.
Sadly...they were wrong.
2007-08-18 12:24:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Nope.
There weren't be this infighting between parties.
I am getting way too tired of the same old tired lines about Bush that are true. They are no longer worth the effort to respond to.
2007-08-18 12:50:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nah, they'd never dream up an overweight doughboy with a penchant for slutty overweight doughgirls - neither of whom have more than a passing understanding of what it is to tell the truth.
Really, Binky, ya gotta get it through yer hed that Reps do not spend their time DREAMING UP white trash - they wait for it to appear on their front lawns before going into action.
And what action it will be if Queen Hillary the Great is returned to her rightful place on the throne along with White Trash Billy as Consort - it's gonna be GREAT!!!
2007-08-18 12:27:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I'm registered with "No Political Affiliation" myself.
It may just be my opinion, but I'm not one to believe that any "liberals" OR "conservatives" really exist anymore.
I share with you grasshopper:
Remember when you were a little kid and that one time, you were in the sandbox, there with your favorite toy, and that big bully came up and took it from you.
He put the toy behind his back, and said: "Guess which hand it's in, and I'll give it back."
No matter which hand you picked, left or right, he always pulled out and empty hand...bye bye toy!
We're done the same way with all of our civic freedoms, liberties, rights...
No matter which party we pick. "Left" or "Right."
Instead of giving our liberties and freedoms back, they only pull out a new tax, fee, surcharge, or restriction of some small, insignificant, thing, that just adds yet another straw on the camels back.
DO WE REALLY NEED TO ELECT ANOTHER LAWYER?
I recommend the doctor: http://www.ronpaul2008.com
I tell you this because I, truly, as your Fellow American, love you all.
2007-08-18 11:35:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Now that you mention it, one can but wonder who would they put the blame on for all of the Bushies screw ups. We know that they could never be their fault, right?
2007-08-18 11:39:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
All you have shown is that Clinton only cared about his lil' guy. Bush cares about global democracy. Why would deomcrats do if they did not have bush to kick around! They have no platform of their own. Its all just "I hate Bush." Ask any dem if we should leave Iraq, and the answer is "Wahhh, he lied!" You prove the point.
2007-08-18 11:39:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by john knee 3
·
2⤊
3⤋