English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean you people complain about him everyday but you elected him so tell me why please.

2007-08-18 11:13:46 · 29 answers · asked by Garrett S 1 in Politics & Government Elections

29 answers

Obviously he was the best man for the job, and history will prove it for him.

But you will have to wait and see.

2007-08-18 11:21:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Bush is by far one of the worst presidents ever. We should have NEVER invaded Iraq, now we have this big problem on our hands. The countries that were behind us on it are already pulling troops out. Everyone knows Bush's real reason for the war is oil. He has lied to the American people countless times.

The retarded people elected for him again even though half a million Americans voted for Gore the first election (he cheated), he should be our president NOT Bush. Also he's a Democrat.

About 3,000 Americans died on 9/11 but in Iraq more then 3,000 Americans have died. Who's to blame?...Bush! His administration will go down as one of our nations worst.

PS
You spelled his name wrong. It's George Bush lol.

2007-08-21 11:31:26 · answer #2 · answered by UCLA kid, Go BRUINS!!! 1 · 0 0

The reason George Bush is president is because both Al Gore and John Kerry screwed up some where along the way, They either did not do something or they did it too late. Also the Republican machinery has been set up to see that George Bush was/is elected. Case in question is the 2000 race.

2007-08-18 11:24:37 · answer #3 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0 1

I sure as hell didn't vote for him. But I will offer is that George Bush is darned good at political campaigning, and his political opponents have often underestimated him.

Bush is incredibly competitive, and has a take no prisoners, go for the jugular attitude towards winning elections, which means going to any or all efforts, whether scrupulous or not. Gore and Kerry didn't seem to get this at all.

Unfortunately, this winner take all attitude means that he isn't above exploiting fear for political reasons - he's beat the drumbeat of terrorism to get the USA into a war that wasn't necessary, and he's used that to sell that to the electorate.

Sadly, George W. Bush unfortunately seems completely uninterested in the actual process of governance - which is why he had that debacle in handling Katrina and the occupation of Iraq.

So in short - I didn't vote for him, and I definitely have the right to complain about him. I TOLD YOU SO.

2007-08-18 12:28:33 · answer #4 · answered by Silverkris 4 · 1 1

As sad as it is and it might sound offencive, but unfortunately majority of American people are simply ignorant and stupid as they themselves elected Bush. Just read their dumb answers here.They were and still being brainwashed and scared by government about non existing terrorists which supposedly want to come and take away their freedom. But in reality the real terrorists are in a white house. And the only terrorists which want to take and which already took away some freedom and certain liberties of American people are their own government. The worth part is that most Americans either that dumb to recognise this or they just do not care. If Bush will not change US constitution prior to next year presidential elections which he might do, American people will have a choice like senile, retarded and trigger happy John McCain or dishonest, pathetic and evil Hillary Clinton. (Her husband Bill Clinton was one of the best presidents America ever had). Would any individual in the whole world other than an average brainwashed American believe that McCain or H. Clinton will stop the war or change anything other than to their own advantage. Somehow majority of American people like little children which believe in Santa Clause and leave in a fairy tale of good and evil. Americans you recently elected democrats to congress. Did they change anything? Did they stop the war? Or they just created another illusion and smoke screen for you that they are good guys and that they "honestly" tried, but somehow bad guys like Bush & Co. did not let them. Ask your congress, ask your senate why, why they did not and will not start an impeachment of G.W. Bush?

2007-08-18 11:31:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

They didn't when he ran against Al Gore. Al Gore received the majority of the popular vote, but the Electoral College (which should be done away with) went for Bush. So the people actually elected Al Gore and not Bush.

2007-08-18 14:18:51 · answer #6 · answered by Lettie D 7 · 0 0

Election Fraud
"Skulls" continuance of dark dinasty.
Democratic Strategy to increase popular repugnance to the Bushes (Republicans)and give the Clinton's a better chance to get back to the presidency...and also and most important...the people's apathy to research and be more involved in the political process...and the incredibly stupid, arrogance to keep believing that this is the "Best Country In The World".

2007-08-18 11:28:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Mainly he played on some peoples religious beliefs.

and or.....

1. For his fantastic Cheerleading skills.
2. His good hair
3. Knows how to keep a party going (country) in stitches.
4. Knows how to relax (423 days) of vacation while in office.
5. Gives big presents to his daddy(Iraq)
6. Kept his promises to his rich friends and made more
millionaires.
7. Nice Librarian Wife.(play down) equalizer
8. Mother that reminded us of George Washington
9. Royality of Crawford, Texas and (tumbleweeds)
10. Hook up that won the election in Florida?

You know the party is over, when Carl Rove left. and the gas prices dropped 10 cent in 2 days!

All that is done in the dark, will soon come to the light.

2007-08-18 11:30:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

In the first place, Bush and cronies stole the first election...he was not elected. The second election was predicated on scurilous lies about his opponent. And, at that, there were many stories about voter fraud. A pox on all their houses. Both parties are in the pockets of big business and a few special interest groups. You and I don't mean squat to the Washington beltway people.

2007-08-18 11:31:42 · answer #9 · answered by homerunhitter 4 · 2 1

I'm registered with "No Political Affiliation" myself.

It may just be my opinion, but I'm not one to believe that any "liberals" OR "conservatives" really exist anymore.

I share with you grasshopper:

Remember when you were a little kid and that one time, you were in the sandbox, there with your favorite toy, and that big bully came up and took it from you.

He put the toy behind his back, and said: "Guess which hand it's in, and I'll give it back."

No matter which hand you picked, left or right, he always pulled out and empty hand...bye bye toy!

We're done the same way with all of our civic freedoms, liberties, rights...

No matter which party we pick. "Left" or "Right."

Instead of giving our liberties and freedoms back, they only pull out a new tax, fee, surcharge, or restriction of some small, insignificant, thing, that just adds yet another straw on the camels back.

DO WE REALLY NEED TO ELECT ANOTHER LAWYER?

I recommend the doctor: http://www.ronpaul2008.com

I tell you this because I, truly, as your Fellow American, love you all.

2007-08-18 11:43:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

People vote for who they like. Of course as the world or country changes the President has to make choices. No matter what he does some poeple are going to like these choices and others are not. There are many things he does I agree with and many things he does I don't agree with. No one is always going to do exactly what I believe they should do.

2007-08-18 11:27:35 · answer #11 · answered by mike b 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers