http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0oGkxJ8VMdGnoYAWZpXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTExY281YmEwBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA3NrMQR2dGlkAwRsA1dTMQ--/SIG=122coh771/EXP=1187554812/**http%3a//newsandmore.typepad.com/911_inside_job/
2007-08-18 09:20:58 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
a faster collapse time (especially if the building collapses in it's own footprint- like the WTC) suggests a more precise demolition.
2007-08-18 09:28:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
If anything that points more towards the WTC being felled with explosives. Surely explosives which have been placed at structural weak points and designed to fell a building in a controlled manner would be far more effective than a randomised fire and an accidental collapse?
I don't think the timings of either collapse are indicative of anything, they're just arbitrary times, especially as 30 seconds is a LONG time for a demolition.
2007-08-18 16:27:09 · answer #2 · answered by Mordent 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Salt Lake City Bank was a controlled explosion. While the WTC fell quickly, the structure had been weakening for an hour or so. The steel support was melting due to the intense heat.
2007-08-18 16:29:46 · answer #3 · answered by BAM 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because the bank was a controlled demolition. The explosions go off at different times to weaken it before it falls, so it will fall in a certain way. This, of course, actually weakens your silly claim that the World Trade Center towers were brought down by explosives, but of course you can't figure that out.
2007-08-18 16:52:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you tell us genius? No actually I will tell you. There is a government program, don't know the name of it but it coincides with the 9/11 attacks and is a plan put in place to dispell some of the rumours of government involvement in 9/11. The first was the steel framed bridge that collapsed due to fire. Never before 9/11 had a steel framed building collapsed due to fire and due to videos on the internet such as loose change and 9/11 mysteries pointing this out the government staged the bridge collapse to point out that this can infact happen when it actually cannot. The bank well you can read that however you want. Only the extremely gullible will lap up the governments version of events and don't really understand anything at all about how badly corrupted and polluted the people who control George Bush really are. Your President is merely the face behind which this group of the most powerful individuals on the planet hide behind. One day soon you are going to realise this when life as you know it changes forever.
2007-08-18 16:25:32 · answer #5 · answered by Open your eyes 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
I'm not sure where you were on 9/11, but I was watching the towers fall on television and it took longer than 9 seconds after the planes hit for those towers to fall.
2007-08-18 16:27:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bank in SLC -- Controlled demolition -- Those involved want to make sure surrounding structures do not get damage. They want the building to fall within its own footprint.
9/11 -- not contolled demolition
2007-08-18 16:28:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Because the WTC was built with marshmellows held together with mayo.
2007-08-18 16:29:07 · answer #8 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
because it was a controlled explosion, the wtc was not an inside job like so many would want to believe. those people just dont understand physics
2007-08-18 16:26:39 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Your yahoo link reroutes it to a conspiracy page.
I highly doubt that your claim is accurate.
2007-08-18 16:27:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋