http://www.mufor.org/nmachine.html
Is there any truth to the article linked above, or is it just another wild conspiracy theory?
2007-08-18 09:18:22 · 11 answers · asked by Perplexed Bob 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I did not have to read very far to see that it is another "perpetual motion" scheme. These have been around for years. Someone claims to have invented a machine that puts out more energy than you put into it. This is impossible. Claims that the government is suppressing this "technology" is just marketing hype.
Lying about WMD's to start a war for the profit of Haliburton etc. I a genuine conspiracy.
2007-08-18 09:25:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
This could never work as it would put the oil companies and Al Gore out of business.
I found a website that said, "Among the yet-to-be-posted papers in this site's listed bibliography is a letter from the US Deptartment of Energy, 9 May 1978, acknowledging their receipt of the N-Machine diagram. On page 57 of the US DOE Comprehensive National Energy Strategy of 1998 it mentions, in the section summarizing public comments, that "One commenter recommended that the DOE look into zero-point energy and mentioned a specific device for harnessing this energy source called the "N" machine. He challenged the Secretary of Energy to fully investigate this technology and let the American public know about it." http://www.hr.doe.gov/nesp/cnes.html". I can't get my computer to get this. Maybe yours will work. Got this from:
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/2depalma.html
2007-08-18 16:59:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't know. It's interesting reading. I imagine many folks thought the same of Nikola Tesla and his inventions.
2007-08-18 17:32:54 · answer #3 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it sounds too good to be true so it likely is, just that too good and not true, it was on one of the urban legends pages sorry lost the link but I read it a couple of years back
2007-08-18 17:12:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
sounds like junk science to me, any time they mention "free energy".
Even in chemistry "free energy" really isn't "free energy" as this article makes claims about.
I don't doubt that energy can be produced in the manner mentioned, but not near as much as claimed, is going to get from generator to load, even with the use of super conductors.
2007-08-18 16:25:36 · answer #5 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It's true. But the facts are that the ruling elite have the world stitched up and while there is easily attainable oil and natural resources in the ground and they are making trillions of dollars profit from these then that is the path we will continue on.
2007-08-18 16:24:25 · answer #6 · answered by Open your eyes 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
If it is true, he should just give up on it. The US government would never let it get to production, as it would potentially put the friends of prominent people out of business.
:-(
2007-08-18 16:26:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
http://depalma.pair.com/index.html
http://www.computerhealth.org/depalma.htm
I Googled Bruce DePalma. There are alot of sites about him and his Primordial Energy machine....
2007-08-18 16:34:12 · answer #8 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'll buy his machine. I'm not afraid to turn it on. I'll haul it to Mexico and turn it on down there. If it works, I'll sell the rights to it to the Mexican government and then live in Cabo for the rest of my life.
2007-08-18 16:30:58 · answer #9 · answered by 8-) Nurf Herder 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If you see some real proof then start to believe it, otherwise its just going to be more rubbish.
2007-08-18 16:43:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋