2007-08-18 08:54:17 · 35 answers · asked by K. Marx iii 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I mean remove from the face of the globe along with the people therein. So It will be minus just one country with the grand plan of making the planet SAFER from wars and strife.
2007-08-18 09:21:29 · update #1
Dav, you are not in the minority. You are on here with us. No input but still here
2007-08-18 09:56:24 · update #2
I see that most think, as I do that the removal of the USA would make things better. As some have said the removal of the USA would take out Israel and thus the thorn in the Middle East. This would give the Arab nations nothing to be unhappy about so comparative peace, except for the Brussels lead dictatorship which would still cause most of the people of Europe problems, but we can't have it all can we.
2007-08-18 19:32:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
China, as this is the third biggest country. The seas would drain into the space left behind, thus saving us from rising sea levels. Any bigger countries removal would leave the UK connected to France, which would be entirely counterproductive. It would also make the Eurotunnel even less of a sucess.
2007-08-18 20:51:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The United States of America.
2007-08-18 11:11:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Well, it's an impossible question - because there is no one country that would make the world safe, if removed. I think you'd probably have to remove all of the countries, and the people along with them, to make the world safe. As long as there are people, there will be war.
2007-08-18 09:11:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
The simple and obvious answers is America.
Trouble is that the causes of world problems are caused by individuals and small groups, not entire nations. The US government would be my choice. Not the American people, just the government.
2007-08-19 01:29:27 · answer #5 · answered by futuretopgun101 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What's Iran done?!
If I was sandwiched between Pakistan, India, Isreal, Russia, and China, with USA spoiling for a fight, I'd want Nukes also!
2007-08-18 14:19:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Once again people who despise their own country are spewing that hate and adhering to the leftist propaganda that the US is the worse nation on earth. These people are not only full of hate, they are truly, and sadly, misinformed.
If the US did not have such military and economic muscle we would not be the most free and prosperous people that have ever lived. Think of where you are and consider how bad it would be if you were somewhere else. The reason you are so comfortable here is because of what the USA is.
China is our greatest threat. An economic superpower with an incredibly large population and military, complete with nukes. Not to mention a growing economic greed.
2007-08-18 09:42:37 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
America without a doubt they are behind most of the unrest in the world.
2007-08-19 07:12:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Zionist Entity (known to its friends as "the state of Israel"). No Israel = no problems between Islam and the West = no terrorism.
2007-08-18 12:19:13 · answer #9 · answered by MBK 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The Isle of Man. (In the Irish Sea between Wales and Ireland).
One is still allowed to smoke in Isle of Man pubs. The tobacco fumes so generated will blow, against the direction of the prevailing wind, into the settlement of Widget, Ohio (population 360 people and 720 SUVs).
The populace of Widget, Ohio, demand that passive smoking generated from the UK be banned, and are planning a protest drive from Seattle to Miami as a protest against atmospheric pollution.
2007-08-18 09:35:32 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋