English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why do so many of you think that, if Clinton couldn't get away with a BJ, he could somehow get away with murdering all of these people you whack jobs think he was responsible for?

2007-08-18 07:16:38 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

Because the Bush followers have to blame someone for Georgie's blunders and Clinton is the obvious choice. Clinton is getting more press and attention as a former President than Bush is getting as a current one. Even the first President Bush hangs around with Clinton more than his own son these days.

2007-08-18 07:26:09 · answer #1 · answered by Debra D 7 · 2 2

Point in fact - regardless of who did what, or didn't do what, each of them, and everyone else will blame the other - When you are in this position, you are a Master at finger pointing.

Whatever sounds the most outrageous is what people will say, if it is too hard to believe then that is the rumor they run with.

So Bill and Monica had a thing, I am sure that there were many more, but I don't lay awake at night worrying about it.

You question did make me laugh!

2007-08-18 08:09:49 · answer #2 · answered by ♥ ♥Be Happi♥ ♥ 6 · 1 0

Any government that kills its people and gets a BJ is only a good government if and only if nobody tells.

Why can't you people get this through your head? The Media, whether controlled by the Dems or the Repubs, or whatever moron comes out of America, is a puppet for the government to tell us what we want to hear while they do what they want.

The Government owns you no matter where you go (okay, maybe not yet on the moon or antartica, but have fun there). Life sucks and then you die. Deal with it.

2007-08-18 08:35:30 · answer #3 · answered by wk_coe 3 · 0 2

I agree if you believe the conspiracy theory nut jobs the Clinton's are personally responsible for anyone who died between the time he was elected governor till he retired as president. That's an exaggeration, but claims of direct involvement in murder is preposterous.

2007-08-18 07:29:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Personnaly, I think the country was run better when the president was getting BJs in the oval office.

2007-08-18 07:41:03 · answer #5 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 0 1

Bush needed help from Rove and Cheney to pull off 9/11.

The BJ was single-handed...

.

2007-08-18 08:15:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

That BJ was strictly between him and his family a personal.matter, but when you start killing Americans , start having little babies without Mommies and Daddies , it becomes all the Americas business and that is what is going on right at this minute.
I seen a lady looking at her sons casket being brought in to the Funeral home, the look on her face of such sadness, she reaching out her arms trying to touch baby son that was killed in Iraq, I will live with that sad look for the rest of my life. He was a SGT, the sadness in her eyes broke my heart. She was reaching out with a look of complete love for a son that didn't make it home except in a casket.

2007-08-18 07:35:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Why do so many people think that Bush (who is dumber than a monkey and can't read) could somehow pull off 9/11?

People have agendas....and they will change the truth to fit that agenda...

2007-08-18 07:24:52 · answer #8 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 3 2

Good point. But you know did you know it was really Bill Clinton, not that actor they framed who shot Abraham Lincoln? The Liberal Media covered it up!

2007-08-18 07:38:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Ask George Wya.

2007-08-18 07:34:48 · answer #10 · answered by Mezmarelda 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers