2007-08-18 07:03:07 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hmmm, let me see... Clinton, a liberal, signed NAFTA and WTO -- sending all of our labor jobs over seas. Unions artificially raise the cost of living by demanding greater pay raises and benefits packages and we all know that the unions are notoriously liberal, force business to look for ways to cut their overhead or are forced out of business... Neo, meaning new. Con, assuming you mean conservative (my bet is you didn't know how to actually spell conservative). You've proven yet again, why liberals are considered retarded by the whole of the thinking world.
2007-08-18 07:19:14 · answer #1 · answered by Doc 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Everything is the governments fault these days. Mine disasters, forest fires, volcanoes, earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes. I had to find a new home due to the tornado that wiped out Greensburg, Ks. You know what? I really don't think President Bush had anything to do with it. And then everyone wants FEMA and other government programs to get busy. Well, now they tell you where and how you can rebuild, whether or not you can have a basement, all this mickey mouse stuff because they gave people a hand out which came from their taxes in the first place. It ain't what it appears so beware of crying for MORE government involvement. Example; a friend of mine whose house had been on this corner lot forever now can't build back because FEMA requires a 30' setback from both streets and that doesn't leave enough room for a house. How wonderful is that?
2007-08-18 14:19:21 · answer #2 · answered by jbertrope 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, that mine collapse in Utah was clearly caused by the lack of an Earthquake Stopper Machine. We need better standards.
2007-08-18 15:10:18 · answer #3 · answered by Biggg 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A neocon is a former Democrat and is a moderate. It would really help your side if you and the other democrat sheep actually learned the definition of the words that you use. remember, words have meaning.
A neoconservative is a liberal who's been mugged by reality.
2007-08-18 14:15:40 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This is really comical. Liberals want no part of expanding nuclear power potential because it is too "dangerous". We have yet to read of ANYONE losing his or her life as a result of a nuclear power disaster in this country. NOT ONE! Yet, today's headlines tell us of yet ANOTHER situation involving a cave-in of a coal mine. We don't know yet how many have died below, but THREE have already lost their lives attempting to RESCUE those trapped. WTF?
2007-08-18 15:24:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we should put more nuclear plants up. they are safer and cleaner.
Why does it make sense to plug an electric car into your garage if the power is coming from a coal power plant?
As for what to do with the waste, put it in the coal mines.
2007-08-18 14:14:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think we should outsource you to India. Off you go!
Like you really care about the miners. . .
2007-08-18 14:08:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Don't give them any ideas. Lest they start appointing unqualified cronies from other countries to over pay with taxpayer money.
2007-08-18 14:13:03 · answer #8 · answered by God 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋