...chry-sakes, when Willie Zipper turns sideways you can see Queen Flannel-shirt's hand up his back! Bill is just Hillary-lite, and the slimey viscious troll is running for President. All the garbage, screwups and depravity are a nice reminder of the double-dose we're gonna get if that witch gets elected.
Why did Lefties go right from claiming his innocence to acknowledging his guilt and claiming it's irrelevant? Now we face the prospect of the uber-Clinton raping the country for another 8 years. It's VERY relevant. Don't you think?
2007-08-18
06:58:22
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
-
Wow Elway, you think Billary is BRILLIANT?...I'm sure if you examine the 500 different opinions she has held on any given subject, one of them might have some merit. But who knows which one is her position at any given nanosecond? - "Brilliant" - LOL, I'm glad that jumped out at me so I didn't have to read the rest of the book you wrote!!
-
2007-08-18
08:38:33 ·
update #1
The Libs want us to forget about Clinton and stop talking about him, but at the same time they glorify his failures.
Will someone please tell me why we should stop talking about this failed president when you keep plastering his face and name everywhere as if he was a hero?
Bill Clinton broke the law , lied under oath, was disbarred and impeached.....and still you wonder why we still talk about him when you celebrate him.
Clinton was the worse president in history.
2007-08-18 07:02:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
6⤋
i'm too youthful to undergo in strategies a lot of Carter, yet he replaced into on the morning information for an interview this morning over a debatable e book entitled, Palestine : Peace not Apartheid' Clinton replaced right into a diplomat and worked without end for peace in the midsection East. He replaced into continuously traveling to the midsection East to barter and mediate conflicts in the area. He did an magnificent job in the midsection East, and that i knew that as quickly as the present president took over....all hell could smash unfastened. regrettably, Clinton did not something whilst the genocide replaced into happening in Rwanda, it particularly is a few thing i believe he later apologized for. He additionally bombed Sudan over a meant chemical weapon plant, which later became out to be a plant producing dysentery drugs. i believe Clinton gained Bush Sr. in the election.
2016-10-16 01:21:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by favaron 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's hard to even respond to this mish mash of hatred and vitriol. I'm not voting for Bill Clinton, I'm voting for Sen. Clinton. I'm not a leftie, or a liberal by the way. Raping the country? Please. A good many people, and not just liberals, compare Bill's Presidency to Bush's and begin to understand the difference between prosperity without making our children or grandchildren have to pay for it in the future, and prosperity because someone competent was sitting in the Oval Office. Even when the Lewinsky scandal was going on Clinton had a higher approval rating than Bush does now. The country wasn't divided over a horribly mismanaged war or having to wonder why we are now practically owned by China and Saudi Arabia because of the billions we have borrowed from them. Instead, during Clinton's Presidency, we watched the Republicans spend millions on a six year witch hunt, which in reality still has not ended, or been successful. In the end Clinton did it to himself, he never should have lied. But even then the incompetency of the Republicans was revealed when they couldn't even get an indictment for the Clinton scandals they themselves created out of hatred. Now they think they can light a fire under those old stories to stop Hillary Clinton from becoming President. I guess they never learn. It wasn't successful back then, and by now the American people are sick to death of it. They want to talk about the here and now, not the old crap the Republicans can't let go of.
Sen. Clinton has my vote based on her own qualifications, her own brilliance, and her own stand on the issues. That she has President Clinton by her side is a terrific boon for her, but those of us who are voting for her aren't doing so because we think he's going to be running things. And those who suggest she ran things anyway during his Presidency are idiots, and that's being kind. As though a Rhodes Scholar, a man who was clearly one of the most intelligent Presidents this country has ever had, needed his wife to make his decisions for him. It's ridiculous. She was valuable to him and did a lot of work while First Lady - she wasn't baking cookies - but she didn't run the country, he did. Now we have the opportunity to take advantage of her own qualifications and amazing brilliance to guide us out of this mess that Bush has created.
EDIT: Lord you Hillary Haters are so boring and predictable. Yes, she's brilliant. She was the valedictorian of Wellesley, one of the top colleges for women in the country. So respected for her talents she was the first student in their long history ever asked to give the commencement speech. Even her political enemies acknowledge her extremely high intelligence. But not you, huh? You prefer to stubbornly cling to any trash you can dredge up about her from wherever you idiots get your Hillary Talking Points.
You didn't have to read anything I wrote at all. You don't want to know differently, and don't really care to begin with. The last you want to know is that you just might be wrong about her. It might do you some good to read a book. Try Carl Bernstein's book about her. The Republicans were so hoping it would provide further fodder for their smear campaign about her. But instead he was objective and provided a many faceted look at her from a mind not overflowing with prejudgments and assumptions - and it ended up being more positive than negative. Too bad, I guess the Republicans will just have to continue their character assassination smear game the rest of us have gotten so sick of. Good luck with that.
2007-08-18 08:02:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If Hillary has sex with another women in her presidency - I really don't care, as long as she is taking care of the business of this country and helping things get better. We don't have to answer for her or Bill. They will be in front of their maker themselves to answer. I just want a good President and end this stupid war and yes I think it's stupid. What a waste of lives and money!!!
If the Bush administration is so worried, then shut the dang gates, kick a couple of million out of this country that don't belong here. There are other ways than to invade a country and totally want to control it. GEEEEEEEEEeeeezzzzzzzzzz
2007-08-18 07:42:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by docie555@yahoo.com 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
The country was upbeat when Bill Clinton was president except for those who fell for the conspiracy theories about him. Many people's lives improved greatly during his terms. The U.S. had a great image throughout the world. Maybe those are small things to you, but I never worried about losing my rights when Bill was the pres.
EDIT: They decided he was probably guilty because of the blue dress. Unfortunate that more money was spent on impeaching Bill Clinton by many times more than was spent on the 911 commission.
2007-08-18 07:07:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Because if Hill gets elected that means Billy will be back in the White house to the delight of those who love him.
2007-08-18 07:05:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
The Bush/Clinton families have been running the country far too long. I think it's time to end the dynasty.
We need new blood in 08.
2007-08-18 07:08:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Overt Operative 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
They don't, won't, or can't face the truth. It's really sad and worse, really dangerous to the well being of the country and those who would have to serve under them!
2007-08-18 07:20:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Brianne 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Oh please. Get over it. So he lied about his womanizing, about sex. If I had to chose between that and what the one in office is doing, then I will be thrilled to death to have Clinton back in there.
2007-08-18 07:07:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by midnight&moonlight'smom 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
Absurd. I can't wait until Bill gets back in.
2007-08-18 07:02:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Thomas Paine 5
·
6⤊
3⤋