I think important fragments of those armed forces (to the degree they exist) only just recently came /off/ the list.
It's not just you, lots of 5th columnists think that, as well.
2007-08-18 07:13:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
there isn't something sinister and in case you afflicted to do any study you're able to understand what that's all approximately. attempt doing a google seek for the Iraq conflict and don't pass to any loopy web content. pass to the congressional information and learn the actually invoice which approved the conflict. pass to the UN internet site and study the 14-sixteen resolutions that have been violated/omitted via the Iraqi government. And in case you fairly do not understand something google "chemical rounds in Iraq" and "350 a lot of yellow cake uranium in Iraq". i think of what you will study is which you fairly do not understand something. That there became out to not be an energetic WMD application did not advise there have been no WMD nor does it advise it replaced right into a "smokescreen" or that every person lied. It skill the intelligence of each intelligence business enterprise in the worldwide have been given it incorrect.
2016-10-16 01:20:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by favaron 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Empitre with 737 Military Bases in 130 countries and the most lethal weapons decides who the "terrorists" are...
Iran's Revolutionary Guard are "terrorists" because they are standing in the way of potential Oil Profits for Exxon-Mobil, Chevron, BP, and Shell.
All Iraqis are "terrorists" until they approve the "Hydrocarbon Law" that will alot 80% of Iraq's oil to be controlled by Exxon-Mobil, Chevron, BP, and Shell.
I'm a "terrorist" because I have protested against the illegal U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq.
2007-08-18 07:12:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Richard V 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Its great to see the liberal machine lie about our government. Its thanks to the overboard efforts of the Church committee in the 70's and the Carter Administration that our CIA was made into a marginal unit that did no detect the beginnings of this war with terrorists or have the resources to intercept the data that would of led to stopping the efforts of al-qaidea to bring American planes crashing into US buildings.
Only a lib like Richard could make such a bold face lie about the US military. There are about 190 countries in the world and he thinks that we have bases in 130 of them, anyone with basic library skills can research to find the minimal number of countries we have bases in and how every year we are cutting bases both foreign and domestically.
2007-08-18 07:34:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
YOU KNOW YOU’RE A LIBERAL if you protest the accidental killing of Iraqi civilians because of the US war in Iraq, but the murder of over 1 million Iraqis at the hands of Saddam Hussein doesn’t count.
2007-08-18 07:01:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
They need to define what they mean by terrorism and terrorists. It doesn't make any sense!
BTW they also have to rewrite college text books while they're at it..
2007-08-18 07:03:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Page 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
No, its not just you. The C!A is "off the range" and I think the executive branch under this President is acting extra-constitutionally.
2007-08-18 07:00:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋