Amazingly, but he has made huge fortune 7 billion dollars by signing a contract with Insurance company, right before it had happened:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=EZ9BofDUXv0&mode=related&search=
Should not he must have been investigated?
2007-08-18 06:21:06 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
nope
2007-08-18 07:45:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you won't be able to pull this one off, lolol. i understand you're in all likelihood out interior the hinterlands someplace or you does not even say that. every physique interior the NYC section who has considered a newspaper interior the previous few months is well-known with with regard to the combat occurring over Silverstein attempting to get financing for 2 of his towers on the WTC internet site (2 WTC and 3 WTC) simply by fact he does not have the money to construct and no one will lend it to him in this financial device. 4 WTC is decrease than shape. He have been given 4.5 billion funds from 11 coverage companies. His hire required him to rebuild interior the form that the WTC homes have been destroyed. The coverage rules required him to apply the money for rebuilding. it quite is in contrast to you totalling your truck and then pocketing the verify in a while. Rebuilding expenditures 9 billion. that's basic arithmetic--you in basic terms upload a brilliant variety of zeroes. In 2006 he conceded One WTC (aka the liberty Tower) lower back to the Port Authority and alongside with it a number of his coverage funds. He has been paying around $80 million a 12 months in hire on homes that not exist with the intention to maintain his rebuilding rights. He did rebuild WTC 7, the sole between the WTC homes that had belonged to him interior the 1st place. he's prosperous sufficient without faux memories of having greater funds being circulated. no one seems to truly like the guy, so i assume he must be content together with his funds.
2016-11-12 20:23:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
rich people don't get investigated for insurance fraud. What is interesting about Silverstein and 9/11 is that all the three buildings he insured went down. And Building 7 should not have fallen the way it did. Building 7 should ignite a huge investigation.
And of course another reason why he's not investigated is because people like kveryeffective dont' believe rich people can commit crimes.
2007-08-18 06:27:45 · answer #3 · answered by Jerry H 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If it's true I'd like to find out how he knew and Bush "didn't"
2007-08-18 07:10:58 · answer #4 · answered by Rosebee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The truth is not patriotic so the patriotic act is to ignore it.
2007-08-18 06:41:52 · answer #5 · answered by Jose R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Considering it was going to cost him twice that much to rebuild, I don't think he made such a good deal. this is just BS and he knew nothing like the rest of us.
2007-08-18 06:31:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
There we threats but I do not think they knew exactly when it was going to happen.
2007-08-18 06:30:10 · answer #7 · answered by melya 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You really don't like Jews huh?
2007-08-21 03:50:44 · answer #8 · answered by Bleh! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I not only knew about it, I helped plan it.
Socialism forever!
2007-08-18 06:30:03 · answer #9 · answered by Hillary Clinton 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Nope
http://gunstuff.com/america-attacked.html
Watch and try to remember the reality of that day than the fantasy land you posted.
2007-08-18 06:26:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋