Is President George W. Bush the most powerful man on the planet?

Question

I mean, according to some people, mainly liberals, he caused:

9/11
Hurricane Katrina
The bridge collapse
The mining disaster
The stock market decline
High oil prices
Hurricane Dean
Poor people being poor
Rich people being rich
etc, etc, etc

IS THIS MAN ONE POWERFUL DUDE OR WHAT?????

Answer 1

I just love the Lib mentality. On the one hand, they say that Bush is stupid, but in the same breath they say he masterminded what could only be described as the most incredibly brilliant covert operation in the history of politics: 9-11.

So, either he's a brilliant evil genius, or he's stupid. Would Libs care to make up their minds?

No matter what happens, Libs blame Bush. With Hurricane Katrina, the first line of defense goes to the Mayor and Governor, two Democrats who absolutely were as worthless as an ice machine in the arctic. Then, after they blamed Bush for not acting more quickly, they criticized him because the officials in New Orleans, probably appointed by the mayor or governor, mismanaged the funds.

If a bridge collapses or a mine has a cave-in, somehow Bush should have foreseen these problems. Is he a psychic?

The reason people blame Bush (or any President in office) is that they are either very mentally lazy, and hence blame the most prominent person they can name, or they are very ignorant about how business and society function.

If someone is poor because they made bad decisions in life, that is not Bush's fault. It wasn't before he was elected President, and it won't be after he's left office. The government is not a 24-hour nanny.

Answer 2

The position he currently holds is supposed to be the most powerful on the planet. Unfortunately his term has been plagued by events that have affected the American people. I guess that many are to blame for poor decisions or not paying enough attention to potential problems. Hurricane Katrina was a disaster caused by a natural event, but there had been plenty of forewarning. The guy in charge of handling it was not particularly smart either. With 9/11 there was plenty of forewarning as well, but someone chose to ignore it.
Everything about the Bush administrations has been plagued by doubt, from the moment he swore in the first time and it became known to the rest of the world that America, who demanded other countries to clean up their voting process, was subject to the same plague.

I cannot understand how he got elected a second term, I did not vote for him because paranoia was no longer a part of my life and his war talk did not get to me any longer.

America could organize effectively to deal with anything. Without the technological resources we now have, America was able to deal with crises and catastrophes. Now, I think we simply believe in the myth, but the real thing is long gone.

I want it back.

Answer 3

together as I evaluate the Bush Presidency an unmitigated disaster it incredibly is bigoted to assert he became the worst we've ever had. James Buchanan holds that doubtful honor. Buchanan allowed the country to crumple and approved the Southern contributors of his cupboard to deliver palms and conflict materiel to their domicile states in open training for secession. interior the time between Lincoln's election and inauguration Buchanan did no longer something as one state legislature after yet another dedicated treason. there have been elected failures on account that. Warren Harding became a completely corrupt individual surrounded via venality. Richard Nixon became a paranoid whose fantasies have been self pleasing. George W. Bush became an entire gadget of his company donors and allowed them to loot their very own traders. Buchanan, even nevertheless, became the only individual who intentionally presided over the breakup of the country. I post that he continues to be the very backside of our electoral barrel.

Answer 4

Bush Administration policies are not only a "great catastrophe" but the products of a disturbed mind, according to this provocative blend of psychological case-study and partisan polemic. Psychoanalyst Frank sifts through family memoirs, the writings of critics like Al Franken and David Corn and the public record of Bush’s personal idiosyncrasies for clues to the President’s character, interpreting the evidence in the rigidly Freudian framework of child psychoanalyst Melanie Klein. He finds that Bush, psychically scarred by an absentee father and a cold, authoritarian mother, has developed a galloping case of megalomania, characterized by a Manichaean worldview, delusions of persecution and omnipotence and an "anal/sadistic" indifference to others’ pain, with removal from office the only "treatment option." The author’s exegesis of Bush’s personality traits-the drinking problem, the bellicose rhetoric, the verbal flailings and misstatements of fact, the religiosity and exercise routines, the hints of dyslexia and hyperactivity, the youthful cruelty to animals and schoolmates, the smirk-paints an intriguing, if exaggerated and contemptuous, portrait of a possibly troubled public figure. But Frank’s attempts to translate psychoanalysis into political analysis are unconvincing. Indeed, if Bush’s reneging on campaign promises is a form of clinical "sadism," and his budget deficits an "unconscious attack on his own parents," then Karl Rove, the Cabinet, and both houses of Congress belong in group therapy with him.

Answer 5

Anyone who holds the office of President of the United States is the most powerful man in the world by default if nothing else.

Allow me to ask the question I think you meant to ask:

Dear irrational socialist wannabes,

If George Bush is the dumbest man in America as you say, how can you attribute to him events of disastrous proportion on a scale that could only be accomplished by a diabolical genius?

Answer 6

He neither caused or helped those situations and that is the problem .

When things start falling apart people look to a leader to act quickly in the face of disasters .

Not drag a nation through a terrible conflict with no end and the decided agenda to establish a permanent force in Iraq at 14 or so bases .

Answer 7

No, he is the most disgraceful man in this planet. And it is extremely ridiculous if he can caused a natural disaster. I am not a liberals, but I think its only a stupid people that would make unrealistic claim like you just mention above.

Answer 8

He's not even the most powerful man in the White House.

Answer 9

President George W. Bush has not caused the things listed below. He is very powerful. He is President of the USA, voted by more people than even in history.

There are always people who are whining, I do not listen them.

Answer 10

No.. President George W. Bush is the most dumbest man on the planet?