English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They all are seriously flawed, but who’s the worst? Big Sister Hillary (whitewater) Clinton, Obama (La Raza) Hussein, John ($400 haircut) Edwards, Bill (tear down the border fence) Richardson, Rudio (welcomed illegals to NYC) Giulianio, Senator Juan McAmnesty, Mittaniel (Flip-flop) Romney, or Fred the lobbyist Thompson.

My vote for worst goes to Obama Hussein as he has sold his soul to La Raza and the amnesty for illegal alien lobby, as well as being inexperienced and naive.

2007-08-18 03:21:49 · 32 answers · asked by Shane 7 in Politics & Government Elections

Don’t forget that Obama bragged to the National Council of La Raza that he marched with the pro-illegals who wanted the govt. to stop enforcing our immigration laws. Obama the Race Panderer by Digger
http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/002444.html

2007-08-18 08:44:20 · update #1

If you are so amazingly intelligent, then why did you get so many thumbs down? I play hardball and I don't pull any punches, sister! All the "mocking nicknames" that I gave the candidates are well earned and accurate.

2007-08-18 08:53:05 · update #2

32 answers

Obama no foriegn policy or military experince. And apparently no clue on either subject

2007-08-18 07:42:00 · answer #1 · answered by Dave 4 · 2 0

The one who seems to me to have the least core ideals is probably Mitt Romney who changes his views on issues more often than I change the channel on my TV. And I think someone lacking in a core is probably the worst choice. Quite a few of the other top candidates do make me wince, too, but he really makes me shake my head.

2007-08-18 09:58:32 · answer #2 · answered by Clint 7 · 1 0

Out of the ones you named: Fred Thompson. Never trust a lobbyist.

2007-08-18 04:14:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Great Question, Decision makes my head hurt. There are just so many Bad Choices. It would be great if we could vote one of these clowns off the Island each week.

2007-08-18 04:49:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Hillary, Obama and Edwards would all be a disaster. It would just be horrible. The thought of it makes me ill. SERIOUSLY sick.

Romney would be bad as well but not as bad as those first three. And I hope McCain is out of the running.

2007-08-18 03:32:41 · answer #5 · answered by sister_godzilla 6 · 3 2

It's a tie between Obama and Guiliani. What jokes!

2007-08-19 03:56:55 · answer #6 · answered by TJTB 7 · 1 0

Hillary Clinton and most of the rest.

the only one with ethics and can help turn our country around is Ron Paul

2007-08-18 05:47:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

i agree with every thing you said about all the candidates but i especially do not want either of these running my country...HILLARY OR OBAMA (sounds too much like OSAMA to me) we have no good candidates running so i will save my vote for another time. i will not vote for someone like a CLINTON that is just BILL running in disguise or for a man who has no or very little political experience. don't know if OBAMA was ever in the military but if he wasn't how could he possibly know what our troops in IRAQ and other countries go thru? i don't want him running a war without the knowledge of the strategy it takes to win. for want of a better choice...i choose MICKEY MOUSE!!!! at least, he is a loyal AMERICAN.

2007-08-18 03:36:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Big bad sister hillary, hands down heck she was there once and screwed things up why do you think she could do better on a 2nd time around, other than mess it up more. But she does have a gift to gab, has written books about family when her own is running around with spots. Keep you own front porch cleaned off you won;'t have time for anyone else porch. if you notice I did not cap her name just 2 show how much I care about her.

2007-08-18 03:33:23 · answer #9 · answered by Yogi 7 · 3 4

Hillary

2007-08-18 03:26:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers