2007-08-17 21:00:25 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
January.2009
2007-08-18 02:13:16 · answer #1 · answered by John 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In 2008
2007-08-22 11:17:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I resent that question. I am a ranch raised Rodeo Cowboy and Bush is no more a Cowboy than I am a Raghead with the Quran in my bomb satchel. He was raised in Maine and so he is more a Crab cracker than a Cowboy. It could be argued that he has a ranch in Texas, but owning a ranch does not make him a Cowboy. Hey I own a car, that does not make me Ted Kennedy, swim in that answer.
2007-08-25 15:21:57 · answer #3 · answered by cowboy_christian_fellowship 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unless he unfortunately dies (I use the word "unfortunately" only because of who he would be replaced by), it looks like we will be stuck with him at least until 12:00 noon on January 20, 2009. I say "at least", because no one knows what will happen between now and then. He might stage another 9/11 style terrorist attack and use that as an excuse to declare martial law and stay in power.
It is too bad the Democrats are so spineless and are doing nothing to impeach him. Bush and his fellow criminals not only deserve to be impeached and removed from office, but they deserve life without parole for treason against the United States.
2007-08-25 10:27:24 · answer #4 · answered by Alan S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are asking me, a little legal citizen, of the United States, to "get rid" Of George W. Bush! You saw what happened to Saddam Hussein! Thus far, he has not committed an impeachable offense, however, given the current congress, he is a lame,lame duck.
2007-08-25 15:02:40 · answer #5 · answered by john c 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We'll get rid of him in 2009. This guy has middle fingered the congress of the U.S., both democrat & republican alike, as well as the entire population of America. He has more concern for Iraq than America. Also, he is far from being a true republican! He doesn't care about the national debt, spending 12 billion dollars a month in Iraq. In his last speech he mentioned the innocent people that are being killed but not one mention of the thousands of American solders & national guard members that are on their 3rd & 4th tours. Oh, remind me how many tours he & Cheney served in Nam. I forget! He certainly is a fearless leader when it is somebody elses blood!
2007-08-23 10:53:13 · answer #6 · answered by peepers98 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would like to say, on behalf of Texans, that the opinions of Mr. Bush do not represent the opinions of the state ofTexas, and the state of Texas is not responsible for what that crazy man does or says, or bombs. Or what borders he doesn't secure. Or for turning the country into a third world fascist country. Or for forming a North American Union.
2007-08-17 21:21:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The United States has no constitutional way of ridding itself of a president so long as he does not commit an impeachable defense, defined as a high crime or misdemeanor such as treason or murder. Political misfeasance is neither.
2007-08-17 21:08:57 · answer #8 · answered by Steve C 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is already a lame duck president because the House of Representatives and Congress are under democratic control. Of course, he could do like Chavez and try to end term limits.
2007-08-17 21:08:27 · answer #9 · answered by Jeff E 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It will be interesting to see the media obituary when he leaves office like the poodle he once lead, the history of the Blair regime and its corruption, will haunt the labour party for a decade. but then again he was the son of thatcher hey!
2007-08-17 21:18:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋