Taken in whole from Brigham, Gapenski, Ehrhardt’s Financial Management: Theory and Practice, 9th Edition page 379:
To estimate the cost of common stock using CAPM:
Step 1: Estimate the risk-free rate, kRF, generally taken to be the yield on a long-term U.S. Treasury bond.
Step 2: Estimate the stock’s beta coefficient, bi , use it as an index of the stock’s risks. The i signifies the ith company’s beta.
Step 3: Estimate the current expected rate of return on the market, or on “average” stock, km. (km, the expected market return, sum of the current risk-free rate and the market risk premium)
Step 4: Substitute the preceding values into the CAP equation to estimate the required rate of return on the stock in question:
kS = kRF +( km - kRF) bi
kS = required rate of return
kRF = risk free rate
km = expected market return
( km - kRF) = risk premium
bi = tendency to move up and down with market. b=1.0 perfectly correlated with market. Market up 10% stock up 10% . b=1.1 market up 10% stock up 11%. B=0.9 market up 10% stock up 9%. b tells us how risky compared to market.
Example:
NCC Company
kRF = 8%
km = 14%
bi = 1.1
kS = 8% +( 14% - 8%) 1.1
= 8% +6.6%
=14.6%
Let me know if you need further explanation or looking for something more.
2007-08-18 05:27:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fama and French have a paper examining the empirical evidence with references to breakdowns, but I can't find a free version on the web. I know one of the problems arise from the different behavior of small and large stocks. Here is abstract. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=440920
2007-08-18 01:38:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by meg 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you could be more specific, that'd be helpful. What exactly are you looking for?
2007-08-17 16:10:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋