2007-08-17 12:44:37 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't buy into the man-made global warming hype, but do believe in saving and preserving our environment.
Years ago, I began conserving, planting new trees and feel that everyone can contribute to keeping a clean environment. I'm not at all apposed to mandating control of pollutants. It makes common sense.
2007-08-17 12:57:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Like the rest of their bastardization of Christianity ,the American whacko Christian fundamentalists have always panned "global warming" and other such ominous warnings as being either something GOD will protect them against OR that these events are in fact the coming of the FRIGGIN RAPTURE when God pulls His/HER Armeggedden and we all go down the drain in two different direction however.
As a consequences these stinking dangerous religious fundamentalists ,just carry on as they always have.
The problem of course that there are some 50 million of these horrid fundies in the US and because they like the lemmings they are vote as a bloc for Republicans they have a profound effect on the outcome of Presidential elections and de fact on the world itself as the US is the world's only super power.
They simply MUST be stopped period.
2007-08-17 20:04:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
How about we all deny global warming, and reduce harmful emissions just for the heck of it??
Libs win, Cons win, the environment wins HOORAY!
2007-08-17 20:27:33 · answer #3 · answered by Boss H 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, like scientifically-trained Democrats they wait until the world's scientific community come to a consensus rather than jump on political bandwagons.
That's why, as we're coming to the end of an ice-age, as we look at the cooling and heating trends of the last few centuries, not just years, we don't jump on the "global cooling" fad a few decades ago, nor the Y2K fad, nor this one.
When scientists agree, it's reason to act.
Until then millions are making money off this fad as well.
When all the politicians on one side agree, and all the politicians on the other don't,...
...we're being played for fools.
Get the consensus, then we'll talk.
If you can't prove your case to the scientific community as a whole, emotional appeals, political bigotry, and spreading unfounded rumors aren't going to do it for me.
2007-08-17 20:00:18 · answer #4 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Boy, you don't read the Bible do you. It says there will be total world peace before Satan comes and starts his thousand year reign on earth then Christ will come. It's easy to see how you liberals always get everything screwed up and lose every time.
2007-08-17 21:18:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm thinking, that and the fact that the biggest disasters are supposed to hit the most impoverished regions first.
2007-08-17 20:02:00 · answer #6 · answered by socrates 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nah...You worry about Global Warming....I still have the Long Johns I bought when the Libs told us we had Global Cooling and the next Ice Age was upon us....
2007-08-17 19:53:35 · answer #7 · answered by Ken C 6 · 8⤊ 4⤋
Not all cons are religious...so I would have to say no.
And for the Religious ones...They care very deeply about what they perceive as a gift from God...so No again.
2007-08-17 19:51:27 · answer #8 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Yes! Haleluya!
2007-08-17 19:56:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Global warming. Sound the alarms. Lib scare tactics to try and win elections.
2007-08-17 19:52:27 · answer #10 · answered by Got a light Leo? 3 · 7⤊ 4⤋