Should there be a "None of the Above" box on election ballots?

Question

Have you ever been in the position where you've not been comfortable with ANY of the political candidates or parties on an election?

What are the options?
Not voting means a vote doesn't get counted.
Voting for the the least distasteful candidate doesn't work either.

With a "None of the Above" box at least there's a no confidence vote, a message that the candidates aren't qualified, etc.

What do you think? What would the side effects be if the choice was included?

Answer 1

Yes there should....






g-day!

Answer 2

I think the important thing is to vote - and if there is no one on the ballot to vote FOR, there is certainly going to be someone to vote AGAINST! Neither major political party is paying attention to the voters. If a third party is able to obtain 5% support in a national election, they will be eligible to receive federal election support - and THAT WILL make the Democrats and Republicans pay attention. Right now, they think they've got political monopoly - your effective choices are either right, or left, liberal or conservative, at the national level.

Answer 3

There need not be none of the above because the voter has the choice not to vote for a position on election day.

VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.

Answer 4

There are in some states that do...... But, as to the national elections it may well be very fitting as well. I would rather be able to vote on a scale say...0 -100% so far I would rate the top contenders at about 5%

Answer 5

The governments might'nt dare do this - because of fact ought to be the only field to be ticked. As maximum folk are 'ill and bored stiff interior the mendacity and cheating' that those politicians do perpetually. The 'vote' as quickly as respected and fought for via the human beings (historical past) has now become in trouble-free terms a 'ineffective tool' to attempt and coach that some sort of democracy is going on interior the country. whilst in 'fact' the elected government only forget approximately all with regard to the mandate that have been given them elected and pass directly to do there very own ingredient (hidden policys) and so it is going on. There only is not any decision now adays - one million bunch of crooks and scammers - or the different bunch of crooks and scammers. Its no ask your self that 'apathy' exists with the voters with their view of government.

Answer 6

This does occur in at least one state. If "none of the above" has a plurality (most votes), the election has to be rerun but none of the candidates of the failed election are allowed to be a contender. It sounds real good to me.

Answer 7

1. "none of the above" would be asking the computer to choose at random like a dice roll.

2. The candidates who want your vote will most certainly get it, even if you refuse to vote.

Answer 8

I think there should be. A no confidence vote is far more meaningful than refusing to vote is. For instance people wouldn't be able to criticize you for not voting. There would also be a record of people's displeasure of the choices.

Answer 9

Yes, so all the none of the above votes could be shifted electronically to whomever the PTB decide should win.

Seriously, I think Fraginal has the correct answer.

Answer 10

Actually, there has traditionally been such a choice during ballots in presidential primaries. In recent years, fewer and fewer people have been choosing that option because it delegates the right to make a decision to other people.

Answer 11

There is a "write-in" opportunity. Just write your own name in there. Serves the same purpose as "none of the above".