Cons please Help Me !!!?

Question

Since liberals are just nay-sayers and conspiracy freaks, Which DICK CHENEY SHOULD I BELIEVE ??

The one in 1994 where he says that Sadaam isn't worth a great loss in American life...

OR

The one in 2007 where he says that he knows we did the right thing, and that we're doing nothing wrong in Iraq at all ?

Answer 1

The new and improved one of course... profits are higher for the new ideas....
Here is youtube vid

Answer 2

The one in 1994 said it's not worth the US going in there alone as the only Country.

When we actually did go in there were over 40 other Countries right along our side going in.

comprende?

Answer 3

In 1994, Saddam really wasn't worth the loss of life.

In 1998, Clinton, and a ton of democrats started to see how dangerous he was:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

Though, I no longer agree with their course of action, I still don't see why the democrats blame Bush for all of this since they are the ones who agreed that Saddam was a threat.

Just don't go quail hunting with him.

Answer 4

Utilizing the corporate domination of the mainstream media and educational textbook producers, the patrician class of the United States continues to white-wash history and current events to perpetrate one of the biggest hoaxes in the history of mankind. They have managed to convince many of their plebs of the virtuous, benevolent, and "democratic" nature of America, to the degree that some violently reject the truth when confronted with it.

The under-funded No Child Left Behind legislation ensures that educators lack the resources they need to prepare their students for mandatory tests which emphasize rote memorization and basic skills. Teaching critical thinking, history, literature, and politics falls by the wayside in the mad scramble to prepare students to pass government-mandated exams. Wouldn't it be wonderful for those atop the food chain in the American Empire if they could virtually eliminate domestic dissent without resorting to mass arrests or torture?

Despite the widening wealth gap, the Wal-Martization of the economy, Katrina, Iraq, stolen elections, an $8 trillion national debt, tax cuts for the wealthy, and increasingly rapacious acts by corporations, many Americans are still oblivious to our descent into fascism. Sucking on the pacifier of conspicuous consumption, they "shop til they drop", lining Corporate America's pockets and freeing the ruling elite to pursue world domination, as outlined in the Project for the New American Century and the Bush Doctrine.

Certainly there are some decent human beings who hold great wealth or positions of power in the United States, but their voices and actions are readily neutralized by the far more numerous spiritually hollow individuals whose existence is predicated on attempting to fulfill their insatiable lust for money and domination of other people.

Answer 5

I would believe AL Gore...... I would clutch onto AL Gore and hang on and worship his every word.

In 1994 AL gore called Sadaam the most dangerous man in the world.

STinks of desperation that you need to go back 13 + years to find an argument doesn't it?

Answer 6

The one in 1994. He just got greedy in the oval office.

Answer 7

I don't think you Dems get it. If we leave Iraq now there will be slaughters of the innocent civilians. You think the death toll is high now? You have no idea the consequences on the innocent if we leave right now. Oh, and things do change in 13 years.

Answer 8

you should be able to believe both since you believe micheal moore.

As for me, I really don't know, and don't really care.

Answer 9

That was then. Of course you omit the dems screeching about Saddam in the 90's. Why was that. So,we are there now. And all dems have is bashing. No solutions. Why am I not surprised.