I say Naynay nay. What about you? What are your reasons behind your answer?
2007-08-17 09:50:33 · 52 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Has he been a good pres. was the question. If he hadn't invaded them in the first place, there would be no need to take troops out.
2007-08-17 10:01:11 · update #1
Yay
2007-08-17 09:53:10 · answer #1 · answered by I, Sapient 7 · 7⤊ 9⤋
None that I keep in mind yet many lifelong Republicans in my nuclear relatives quietly stop the occasion. This incorporates my mother and father, a brother and a couple of sisters. An aunt who replaced into an energetic member won't even say the occasion's call anymore. The 2008 presidential vote shows what proportion Republicans crossed occasion strains to rebuff neoconservatism. classic conservatives of the Goldwater mildew are and have been appalled on the huge boost of government and invasion of privateness below The Patriot Act.
2016-10-15 23:26:55 · answer #2 · answered by simpkins 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say nay. There are too many reasons to list. Bad president. Will have the largest number of vacation days ever as a sitting president.
No major legislation passed over 8 years.
No fiscal responsibility.
He is responsible for spending more than all other presidents combined by the time his time is office is over.
No accountability. "WMD, Sadam, 911 connection" all turned out to be untrue. His excuse I got bad intelligence.
How about finding about the leakers so he could bring those parties responsible. Libby and Rove are the leakers. Libby gets pardoned and Rove is retiring.
Bush supporters are as out of touch with reality as he is.
2007-08-17 10:04:53 · answer #3 · answered by taxman1022000 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There is good and bad in everyone who has filled this office, some worse than others, and there has ALWAYS been those who are against the fact that the President even breathes, so I guess for some they will never be happy.
I say Yay because he has done the best he can with the situation handed to him, and we have not had another 9-11 since, so if we stop being so critical, put our efforts into being supportive it make may everyone happier.
Who is to say that the next person in the White House won't make him look like a saint?
2007-08-17 10:04:36 · answer #4 · answered by ♥ ♥Be Happi♥ ♥ 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Overall I would Yay but in prospective. Every president makes decisions that can be harshly criticized in retrospect. He made a decision based on what he was presented and what he believed. We should not forget that many including Mrs. Clinton strongly supported the war in Iraq. After the 2000 election many were going to hate him no matter what he did. It will be apparent when you read responses from people with far less success or formal education call him a moron or idiot. We should also remember that he is on his second election. Even if a stockpile of WMDs were found they would still hate him. Unbelievably there are people in this country that support the Guantanamo Bay detainees more than our President. The bottom line is that the 9/11 attacks were planned for years so the blood for that attack does not fall on his hands. I would rather have a President that has the courage to make the tough unpopular decisions.
2007-08-17 10:08:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I just answered this question an hour ago. How many times does it get posted in a given day?
NAY, Nay a thousand times nay. He is a liar, corrupt, incompetent, arrogant and greedy.
2007-08-17 09:56:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Well that's a HUGE NAY!
"We got an issue in America. Too many good docs are gettin' out of business. Too many O-B-G-Y-N's aren't able to practice their...their love with women all across this country."
In a democracy, its leader should never declare himself as "the decider."
2007-08-17 09:57:35 · answer #7 · answered by khanomtom83 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
I say hell no. Thank goodness he can not come back in office. He has hurt America more then helped. He is a coward!!! I support our military always and forever. But do not support Bush. He should have never been elected.. It is time a Clinton comes back into office and what better for it to be a female to clean up the messes he has made....
2007-08-17 09:55:16 · answer #8 · answered by mrsyac2 2 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Nay. Because he just makes the county worse.
2007-08-17 09:56:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Nay.
Illegal war, for no real reason.
Slowly stripping away our civil liberties.
Using religion shamelessly for votes.
Illegally tapping phone lines.
Failure to respond to the New Orleans tragedy in a decent amount of time.
Record number of vacation days taken.
This list could go on forever..
2007-08-17 09:55:41 · answer #10 · answered by Ethernaut 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋
I don't know him personally but judging by the state of the country since he's been president, I would have to go with NAY. I wish someone would get elected that would CHANGE THINGS. For the better.
2007-08-17 09:54:22 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋