English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

this not meant to be a inflamitory question as im sure will be said but rather a honest look into the stopped, blocked and delayed investigations of thes buildings. it was not until 411 days later, after much pressure from the american people that a investigation even took place. never in u.s. history has this happened. investigations have always been launched within hours or days. the nist report and the 9/11 commission report, or ommission report as i like to call it, cleary are the act of a cover up and the hiding and supression of the truth. please take a little time to examine the evidence, listen to the experts, the fireman, first responders, and see actual video footage that you did not see in mainstream media. give me your honest opinion.
nist report 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4epUmPXXtbU
nist report 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VJGILSOr2k
nist report 3
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1280538348624036762&q=nist+report&total=105&start=10&num=10&so=0&t

2007-08-17 09:12:54 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

9/11 commission report
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSuQUvbl8Hc
ommossion report 2
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6837001821567284154&q=9%2F11+commission+report&total=331&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

2007-08-17 09:14:56 · update #1

in fairness , here it the nist report website
http://wtc.nist.gov/

2007-08-17 09:17:04 · update #2

again in fairness, research the ommission report lies for yourself
http://www.9-11commission.gov/

2007-08-17 09:18:35 · update #3

email, i myself work as a independant researcher and became tired of hearing about these wild accusations of 9/11 being a inside job. in a attempt to debunk these people i once called nut jobs, i set out to do just that. today i tell you that there is without a doubt a cover up and no question that in fact 9/11 was a inside job. thanks for your response

2007-08-17 10:15:06 · update #4

kronos, DEMOLITION of building 7 ? the official story was that it fell as a result of fire. it takes several weeks and even months in some cases to prepare a building for controlled demolition. are in fact admitting that it was a inside job, preplanned?

2007-08-17 10:20:52 · update #5

eric, your statement lacks thought or insight. your insults are weak and without merit, making you........null and void

2007-08-17 10:24:40 · update #6

9 answers

Who gained? well... first the landlord made mucho munnys billions and then there is Bandar Bush and the Saudis and Bin Lauden family... I'm sure the Moonies with their Unification Church is somehow involved in the mess. What a world. What a World.○☺○ the war profiteers pirates... Zeitgeist reveals most of the story... it is a must see in addition to the above links. Do your own research and think think think about it. Which way makes more sense.
Who fed us the illusion. Zeitgeist the movie answers many questions.

2007-08-23 20:19:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I didn't watch the videos, but obviously there is a cover-up. What I don't know is what is being covered up. Did the Bush administration plan the attack themselves? Did they know about the attack in advance, and intentionally did nothing to stop it because they knew it would benefit them politically? Or were they just totally incompetent?

I suspect it is one of the first two, but in any case we don't know for sure. We have not yet conducted a legitimate investigation, where all of the evidence is looked at, and everyone who might know something is questioned and cross examined under oath (and preferably on national TV).

Unfortunately the Republicans have stood for their party and not their country, so they made sure that we didn't have a legitimate investigation. I realize that the Democrats were hindered by their minority status for over 5 years, and really had no power to force a legitimate investigation. Now that they have the power, they have been totally spineless. Not only on the 9/11 issue, but on every crime this administration has committed. They are afraid that by looking at the past they will look like they are seeking revenge, and they might lose the elections in 2008. This is a lousy strategy. Justice is not revenge, and people understand that. If the full extent of the crimes of this administration were fully exposed to the public, the Republicans would be lucky to get 20% of the vote, and their party would be totally decimated. Not only that, but Bush and many others would be in prison for life without parole, and would serve as an example to prevent future politicians from doing the same thing.

2007-08-25 08:12:48 · answer #2 · answered by Alan S 6 · 0 0

curiously, the government would not even understand yet. WTC7 replaced into intentionally excluded from the 911 fee checklist with the aid of fact the government could desire to not arise with a possible clarification for it. We nevertheless anticipate a proof. it won't in any respect come, with the aid of fact it replaced right into a controlled demolition which, of direction, the government won't be able to admit. the government could have performed the story diverse for WTC7. if that they had devised a narrative that by some skill the terrorists have been waiting to establish explosives, probably the ordinary public could have offered the products. particularly, they attempt to declare some thing thoroughly magnificent, and that has led to many people to start looking extra heavily on the full of the government's invoice of things surrounding 911. next time, they're going to understand extra advantageous. Sloppy artwork. And in case you doubt in spite of if activities of the fee of 9/11 could desire to be coated up, think of lower back. The day earlier 9/11, Rumsfeld pronounced that 2.3 TRILLION money replaced into lacking. that could desire to pay approximately 25,000 people $one hundred million each and each. could desire to twenty-5,000 people pull off 9/11. specific, of direction they could, exceptionally thinking it replaced into President Bush's family in charge of risk-free practices on the worldwide commerce midsection, a fact the stronger circulate information looks reluctant to point. not less than, the government had boost warning of 9/11.

2016-10-15 23:19:24 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I'm not sure when they let you out of the institution, but there are plenty of "real people" that saw the planes strike the WTC and the Pentagon. And do you think al Qaeda admitted responsibility for 9/11 simply to make the U.S. government look good?

2007-08-22 08:50:01 · answer #4 · answered by tpafl06 1 · 0 1

(This is not exactly what I believe, I'm just voicing what I have heard from the conspiracy theorists)
Perhaps the government needed time to get rid of all the evidence that showed that they were in some way involved. The demolition of building 7 was particularly suspicious because it was totally unnecessary and many people in the government stood to gain millions from insurance because of its destruction.

2007-08-17 09:20:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

The conspiracy theorist need medication to deal with this. You'd love for there to be any explanation other than the terrorist being responsible, like the president or the mob. Sad that people listen to Rosie O'Donnel.

2007-08-17 09:32:38 · answer #6 · answered by Eric 2 · 3 2

i rejected conspiracy and cover up theories for years, but when i gave the evidence a chance, it is obvious there is a major cover up around 9-11, as you said.

i honestly urge anyone who totally rejects these theories to just give it a look, just give truth a chance, question authority.

2007-08-17 09:20:48 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 3 2

Hillary and Pelosi. Insiders. Right?

2007-08-17 09:18:58 · answer #8 · answered by junglejoe 2 · 2 1

those who had something to hide

2007-08-17 09:18:00 · answer #9 · answered by . 5 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers