2007-08-17 08:22:46 · 52 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
i've been drinking since i was 6 weeks old. my mom squeezed it out of her breasticles.
cuz i'm blink its poopy!!
i wanna lick u!!
2007-08-17 08:28:52 · answer #1 · answered by Don't Blink, Its Poopy! 1 · 0⤊ 4⤋
That would be pretty stupid. But, it doesn't really matter because kids drink even younger than 14 anyways.I have a name for those kids: Losers. They think they are so cool, but they won't think they're cool when they do something really stupid while they're drunk that gets them in big trouble. However, they should lower the age to 18 because that's when you become an adult.
2007-08-17 08:38:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I consider "privateness now please"...with one exception: decrease the criminal eating age to 18 for militia workers purely, yet i could boost it to twenty-5 for everyone else. i'm seeing too many irresponsible young ones killing one yet another on the roads and in fights and leaping off homes and so on. in the event that they are going to fill their bodies with strategies changing chemical substances, they could have adequate user-friendly experience in place and subconsciously ingrained earlier doing so. and that's some thing purely age can get carry of. with the aid of fact that there fairly isn't a call for raising the eating age for many folk of the inhabitants, then i assume my answer is "not one of the above".
2016-10-15 23:12:20 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Noooo. Then kids would want to start drinking when they're 12!
Look at all those 18-20 year olds that get into clubs and drink when they aren't even 21!
2007-08-17 08:27:26 · answer #4 · answered by allllison. (: 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely NOT, college kids of legal age are already drinking themselves to death during binges, so you can imagine what would happen if younger kids start drinking at an earlier age. They are NOT mature enough to handle liquor.
2007-08-17 08:28:41 · answer #5 · answered by WC 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
so your 14 and you want to drink pretty much?
NO they shouldnt. I think 18 is reasonable but 14 is way too young.
2007-08-17 08:25:52 · answer #6 · answered by notquiteabutterfly 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
maybe to 18 but 14 is way to young!! but they have it at the age of 21 becuase that is usually when the body stops growing and it can handle the alchohol better and it wont mess up your kids in the future.... like premature birth and or misscarriges...
2007-08-17 08:28:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
no that's way too low... i think 18 is a good age... i mean it's the legal adult age, so why not have the right to drink along with it?
just my opinion....
2007-08-17 08:28:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yeah definitely, so that you and other kids can drink in high schools? No way kid, do you know how bad can alcohol harm your brain in that ages?In your ages you have to develop brain stem evoked potentials and not destroying them!!!!!!!
2007-08-17 08:28:05 · answer #9 · answered by Ivan 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes. If a 14 year-old kills someone, they are tried as an adult.
If 14 year-olds are old enough to be tried as adults, they're old enough to drink.
Actually, the answer is no. But minors should be tried as minors.
2007-08-17 08:28:01 · answer #10 · answered by pr0ph3t1cl1v1ty 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hell yeah. They're going to do it anyway. I think I was drinking with my dad when I was 10. Vodka shots or "shine" when he could get it. My brother's crazy now because of booze. Actually, he's crazy anyway. At least we were supervised until he passed out.
2007-08-17 08:27:30 · answer #11 · answered by Whojack the Pifitarian. 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋