Obama is losing the battle in the majority of key states across the country to Hillary Clinton.?

Question

Do you think it's the result of the debates? His naive foreign policy statements? She just keeps gaining ground. Is there anything Obama can do to stop the Hillary Clinton freight train?

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20070817-9999-1n17field.html

CA: 49% to 19%
FL: 41% to 18%
Michigan: 32% to 16%
New Jersey: 46% to 20%
Nevada: 33% to 19%
NH: 33% to 24%

In two states, Iowa and SC, she is ahead, but only by the margin of error.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/latestpolls/index.html

Answer 1

I think the main thing is the Clinton's have a very strong organization that works each state hard finding donors, campaign workers, important people to be supporters of in that state, great media coverage efforts in the major media outlets in the states, and finally ensuring that the errors made by their opponents are clearly exhibited.
Obama clearly has shown his naivete as Hillary has commented on and then he goes and attacks an ally after his show of weakness on protecting America. Hillary is capitalizing on these points and John Edwards is just not even hitting the radar except when his wife makes a comment clearly not a way to gain votes for yourself.

Answer 2

i think of that is too early for her to place in writing her Nomination speech in simple terms yet. what number months are we out in the past the 1st universal? a minimum of three-4 from right here. And no person has relatively been spending the money yet so i do no longer think of the two to a million margins will carry in all of those states. What Obama and Edwards for that count could desire to do is stay to tell the story factor. Hilary Clinton is the corporation candidate in this celebration. she would be risk-free, properly coached and barely will pass off subject count without fairly some practice. that form of rigidity gets closer her, the two right here interior the primaries or interior the final election whilst the Republicans can commence beginning up on her with each and all the dirt they have accrued over the final sixteen years. speaking of the canned assaults waiting for Hilary, does every person else think of that her meteoric upward push in each and all the polls could in some way be a set up? I mean, if i grow to be a Republican startegist, i could desire to run against a primary commodity the place i could desire to certainly marginalize them and teach that they've not any new techniques. i could then do what i could desire to, to impact the different celebration to place my opponent (aim) interior the race against me. Manipulating pollnumbers is far too basic. you purely could desire to be responsive to what to ask. The Republican celebration is clever adequate to try this. If Clinton waltzes into the nomination with very few speedbumps then i does no longer be stunned if each and every nasty element that Mrs. Clinton ever did in life would be broken right down to 30 sec. soundbites and broadcast 4 circumstances an hour in classified ads.

Answer 3

Obama's problem is the same as Edwards' problem. They both inspirational speakers but have no substance. Hilary Clinton obviously has some experience that's relevant to being president. The other Democrat with impressive credentials is my personal favorite, Bill Richardson. He's the only Democrat running who's been in the leadership in Congress, served in the cabinet or made foreign policy (and he's done all three).

Answer 4

To answer your question, yes Obama is loosing ground. Many reasons, his lack of political experience both at the national and international level, his overly openess, and the way he talks and presents his ideas. Regular folks want regular words and simple explanation Obama has a tandency to use big words and long long sentences. Also the tone of his voice is not very appealing and mostly monotone, kinda boring. So what does he need to do? get more experience and try again in maybe 8 years from now.

Answer 5

I like obama, I like him a lot, I would want him as a president but not in the current climate, I dont think he's deep enough in trenches so to speak, He's capeable of dodging the big fish while swimming with the at the same time, which in washington is a skill but not everything

Answer 6

JOYCE S. - Hillary Clinton was not a Rhodes Scholar. That was her husband, a guy named Bill. (I'm not even sure women were eligible for the Rhodes back then.)

She IS very bright, though. But, I'm not happy - see my reply to Elway's other post of this same question.

Answer 7

Obama is quickly becoming yesterday's news. His attacks on our service members and bad positioning on world affairs have taken him out of the A list of candidates. Hillary will be free to pick someone like Edwards as a running mate. It really will be a lost cause because She will be imploded by her own campaign mistakes just after the nomination. The Conservatives are anxiously awaiting her nomination to unleash the hammer on her campaign.

Answer 8

The American people know that he's too lacking in executive experience for the presidency.

And Hillary of course will have Bill on her team.

Answer 9

Obama is going down the tubes. I think much of it is because he just doesn't have the experience. Mostly, he's got a big mouth and he shot it off when he talked about foreign policy. That proved that he's an idiot and should be president.

However, I don't think Hillary should be president either!

Answer 10

Did you know Mrs. Clinton is a Rhode Scholar? She has a fist full of experience in government. How can he win even with Oprah backing him.